Porsche has issued a recall affecting two of its most popular electric vehicles: the 2022–2023 Taycan and the 2024–2025 Macan EV. While the Taycan faces a potential airbag malfunction, the Macan EV is dealing with a rearview camera issue — both of which raise serious safety concerns.

If you own one of these vehicles in California, here’s what you need to know — especially when it comes to your rights under the state’s Lemon Law.

What are the problems?

  • Taycan (2022–2023): A defect in the passenger seat sensor may cause the airbag to fail to deploy in a crash. Porsche is replacing the entire passenger seat cushion in affected vehicles to resolve the issue.
  • Macan EV (2024–2025): Owners are reporting rearview camera malfunctions due to wiring or software faults. Porsche plans to issue software updates and, where necessary, address hardware issues related to the camera system.

In both cases, these are active safety systems, and failure could put drivers and passengers at risk.

What’s being done?

Repairs are already underway at Porsche dealerships. Taycan owners will receive a new seat cushion with an updated sensor module. Macan EV owners will either receive a software patch or additional service to fix camera system components.

Why Lemon Law may apply in California

Here’s where things matter for Porsche owners in California: If your vehicle has required multiple trips to the dealer, or if these repairs leave your car out of service for an extended period, you may qualify for protection under the California Lemon Law.

That includes:

  • Safety system failures (like airbags or backup cameras)
  • Delays in getting proper parts or repairs
  • Ongoing electrical or software issues that affect performance or reliability

Even luxury vehicles like Porsche aren’t immune to defects — and when problems start to stack up, the law is on your side.

What you should do:

  • Keep a clear record of all repair visits and communication with Porsche service departments
  • Take note if you’re told parts are on backorder or if repairs are delayed
  • Reach out to a Lemon Law attorney if your vehicle continues to have issues or you’ve lost confidence in its safety

You invested in a high-end electric vehicle — and you have every right to expect high-end reliability and support.

If your Porsche Taycan or Macan EV has been giving you problems, especially related to safety features or software bugs, reach out today. Call Now for a FREE Case Review at 888-395-3666 or fill in the contact form at the top of the page. Our experienced team is here to help you navigate the process and ensure you receive the compensation you deserve. You may be entitled to a refund, replacement, or compensation under California law.

If you drive a 2024 or 2025 Volkswagen Atlas or Atlas Cross Sport, there’s a recall you should know about — and it’s not something to ignore. Volkswagen has recalled approximately 177,000 vehicles because a loose engine cover could come into contact with hot engine parts, increasing the risk of fire.

For California drivers, this issue may also open the door to a Lemon Law claim, especially if repairs have been delayed or your vehicle has shown signs of repeated defects.

What’s the issue?

According to Volkswagen, the engine cover may not be properly secured, and during driving, it can shift out of place. If it comes into contact with the exhaust manifold or other high-temperature components, it could melt or ignite — which is a clear safety risk.

This is the kind of problem that’s easy to overlook — until it becomes dangerous.

What’s being done?

Volkswagen dealerships are currently performing repairs, which may include either removing or properly securing the engine cover. Owners should be notified, but if you’re concerned about your vehicle, you can contact your local dealer to ask if you’re affected.

Why it matters under California Lemon Law

If your vehicle is under warranty and has a serious safety defect, California’s Lemon Law is designed to protect you. That includes issues that:

  • Create a fire hazard or compromise safety
  • Require multiple repair attempts
  • Keep the car in the shop for long periods

Even if this is the first recall you’ve faced, if your Atlas has had other issues, or if this repair takes a long time to complete, it may be worth exploring whether your vehicle qualifies as a lemon.

What you should do:

  • Check your repair history and note any previous service visits related to engine components or unusual smells
  • Schedule a repair with your dealer as soon as possible
  • Keep every service invoice and communication
  • Speak with a Lemon Law professional if your vehicle has been unreliable or unsafe

You don’t need to wait for something to go wrong. If your Atlas has had repeated problems or spent too much time off the road, you may be eligible for a refund or replacement.


California law gives you real options — and you don’t need to pay anything upfront to find out if your case qualifies. We’re here to help you understand your rights and take the next step.

If you’ve recently purchased a Tesla Cybertruck, you’re probably enjoying the attention it brings — but there’s something new owners need to be aware of. Tesla has issued a recall affecting about 46,000 2024-2025 Cybertrucks due to a faulty exterior trim panel that could detach while driving.

This isn’t just about aesthetics — it’s a real safety issue and could raise serious Lemon Law concerns here in California.

What’s the defect?

The problem lies in a trim piece along the windshield, called the cantrail panel. Tesla says it may have been attached using the wrong adhesive. As a result, the panel could come loose and separate from the vehicle while you’re on the road.

If you’ve already noticed unusual wind noise or seen Cybertruck owners post about missing trim — this might explain it.

What’s Tesla doing about it?

Tesla has already started performing repairs, which involve replacing the entire cantrail assembly. Owners aren’t expected to pay out of pocket for the fix, but the availability of parts — and service appointments — can vary widely.

Why Lemon Law applies here in California

Tesla has had a mixed track record when it comes to customer service and timely repairs. If this defect has left your vehicle in the shop for a long period, or if your Cybertruck has other unresolved issues, you could be protected under California’s Lemon Law.

You may qualify if:

  • You’ve experienced repeated or serious safety-related issues
  • Tesla can’t fix the defect within a reasonable number of attempts
  • Your vehicle has been out of service for 30+ total days under warranty

It doesn’t matter if your truck is new or leased — what matters is whether it’s safe, reliable, and performing the way it should.

What you can do right now:

  • Check your paperwork to see if you’ve already reported trim or body issues
  • Schedule your repair as soon as possible — and keep all documentation
  • If you’ve already had problems with build quality or multiple repair visits, it may be time to explore your legal options

Don’t assume you have to live with poor fit and finish. California law is on your side, and in most cases, you can pursue a Lemon Law claim without paying anything out of pocket. If your Cybertruck has already spent more time in the shop than on the road, let’s talk. You may be entitled to a replacement or refund — and we can walk you through what that looks like. Call Now for a FREE Case Review at 888-395-3666 or fill in the contact form at the top of the page. Our experienced team is here to help you navigate the process and ensure you receive the compensation you deserve. Don’t wait – take action today to protect your rights as a California consumer!

If you own a 2022 to 2025 Toyota Tundra — including the hybrid models — there’s a recall you should know about. It involves a defect in the reverse light system that could leave you backing up in the dark, quite literally.

This issue affects around 443,000 vehicles, and while it might seem minor at first glance, it raises both safety and legal concerns for California drivers.

What’s the problem?

Toyota found that moisture can get into the reverse light assemblies, which can cause the lights to fail unexpectedly. That’s bad news if you rely on your lights to safely navigate out of a driveway, a parking spot, or a tight alley at night.

Even worse, Toyota says the problem may also point to corrosion in the wiring, which could lead to other electrical issues down the road.

What’s being done?

Repairs are expected to begin in mid-July 2025, and Toyota plans to replace the reverse lamp assemblies and check for corroded wiring. Until then, owners are left waiting — and possibly driving a truck that isn’t fully safe.

Lemon Law and why it matters

In California, the Lemon Law protects you when your vehicle has a defect that:

  • Affects safety or drivability
  • Repeatedly hasn’t been fixed
  • Or causes your vehicle to be out of service for an extended period

If your Tundra has already had issues with the reverse lights — especially if you’ve brought it in more than once — you might have a strong case. The same is true if your truck ends up sitting in the dealership for weeks waiting for parts this summer.

What to do:

  • Make sure you have a copy of any previous service records involving the lighting system.
  • Once repairs are available, get them done — and ask for detailed paperwork showing exactly what was replaced.
  • If your vehicle has been unreliable or unsafe due to this issue (or others), it’s worth talking to someone about your Lemon Law rights.

You shouldn’t have to wait months to feel safe in your truck. And you definitely shouldn’t have to accept defective parts in a vehicle you paid good money for.

If you’re experiencing problems with your Toyota Tundra or have questions about your rights under the California Lemon Law, Call Now for a FREE Case Review – 888-395-3666 or fill in the contact form at the top of the page. Our experienced team is here to help you navigate the process and ensure you receive the compensation you deserve. Don’t wait – take action today to protect your rights as a California consumer!

If you drive a Chevy Silverado or Tahoe, a GMC Yukon, or a Cadillac Escalade, you may have already heard some rumblings about a major recall involving General Motors’ 6.2L V8 engine. The problem is serious — and if you’re in California, it could also mean you have rights under the California Lemon Law.

What’s the issue?

GM is recalling over 600,000 vehicles from model years 2021 through 2024 because of a defect in the connecting rods and crankshafts. These parts can fail suddenly and without warning, leading to complete engine failure. It’s not the kind of thing you want to find out about when you’re halfway to Los Angeles in the summer heat.

Who’s affected?

The recall covers:

  • 2021–2024 Chevrolet Silverado, Tahoe, Suburban
  • 2021–2024 GMC Sierra, Yukon, Yukon XL
  • 2021–2024 Cadillac Escalade, Escalade ESV

Dealerships are expected to begin sending out notification letters starting June 9, 2025. GM has stated they’ll either repair or replace the engine — no cost to you.

Why it matters under California Lemon Law

California has one of the strongest Lemon Laws in the country. If your vehicle has had ongoing problems or has spent a significant amount of time in the shop, you may qualify for a buyback, replacement, or compensation — especially when the issue is related to a serious safety defect like engine failure.

Even if your engine hasn’t failed yet, if you’ve had multiple repairs or long service delays related to drivability or performance, it’s worth exploring your options.

What to do now:

  • Keep an eye out for a recall notice.
  • If your vehicle has already experienced engine trouble, gather your repair records.
  • Don’t wait to talk to a Lemon Law professional if you’ve been back and forth to the dealer or you’ve lost confidence in your vehicle.

You don’t have to fight a manufacturer on your own. California’s laws are there to protect you — and in most cases, the manufacturer covers your legal costs.

If you’re concerned about your vehicle’s engine defect or have questions about your rights under the California Lemon Law, Call Now for a FREE Case Review 888-395-3666 or fill in the contact form at the top of the page. Our experienced team is here to help you navigate the process and ensure you receive the compensation you deserve. Don’t wait – take action today to protect your rights as a California consumer!

For decades, the California Lemon Law has been the legal sword available to consumers gifting them needed legal power against auto manufacturers. The lemon law in California is also generous to consumers providing them with a provision which places the obligation upon the manufacturer to pay the consumer’s legal fees and costs.

Up until Covid, very few law firms specialized in the lemon law, with Edzant Price, LLP being one of the few. The relationship between these few law firms and the auto manufacturers was cooperative, with most law firms presenting to the manufacturers cases which were generally strong. Prior to filing a lawsuit, or “pre-litigation,” most firms also provided manufacturers an opportunity to repurchase or replace the defective vehicle, which was often accepted. As such, filing lawsuits in lemon law cases was usually unnecessary as most cases were resolved during pre-litigation. The average pre-litigation case was completed within 90 days. The manufacturer paid the legal fees for the consumer based upon the time it took the law firm to resolve the case pre-litigation.

However, post Covid, several new law firms entered into the lemon law arena and adopted an aggressive, and unnecessary, tactic to pursue these claims wherein they did not give a manufacturer the opportunity to repurchase a vehicle pre-litigation. Instead, these firms would file lawsuits against the manufacturers immediately, thereby forcing a case into litigation. (Many of these cases were also weak and should not have been accepted by any law firm.) So why would they do this? Because of the obligation imposed upon the manufacturer to pay the legal fees for the consumer. In litigation, the amount of time to pursue a lemon law case is substantially higher than resolving a case pre-litigation, allowing the law firms to bill manufacturers much higher legal fees. There is no benefit to the consumer.

Furthermore, the amount of cases filed by these firms was staggering, with court filings amounting to thousands of new cases per month. As predicted, the courts were unable to manage this massive influx of filings, taxing the civil justice system to a breaking point. In addition, the manufacturers had to spend tens of millions of unnecessary dollars defending these lawsuits. Instead of 90 days to complete a case, an average case was now taking one to two years to conclude. Simply put, the system had become horribly abused, creating a substantial burden upon the courts, the auto manufacturers, and attorneys. The system was now broken and had to be corrected.

To curb this lawsuit abuse, the California legislature created a condition that anyone seeking to bring a lemon law case must first give the manufacturer the opportunity to repurchase or replace a qualified vehicle prior to filing a lawsuit. (There are some exceptions.) This prerequisite to filing a lawsuit is designed to significantly reduce the number of lawsuits being filed daily and to curb the abuse of the civil justice system. Most importantly, this law change is designed to provide consumers of defective vehicles a quicker and smoother pathway to resolve their legitimate lemon law claims.

Edzant Price LLP advocates that all lemon law cases should try to be resolved prior to filing lawsuits. For over 35 years, we have always given the manufacturers the opportunity to repurchase or replace a vehicle prior to filing lawsuits. We believe this method of presenting lemon law cases help consumers get out of defective vehicles quickly and is also fair to auto manufacturers. Additionally, we only accept and pursue cases which have merit. Because of the way we pursue our cases, manufacturers treat Edzant Price, LLP with the utmost respect and know that when our name is on the case, the case should be taken seriously.

Audi has announced a safety defect affecting certain high-voltage battery modules in its 2022-2023 Q5 Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle (PHEV) and A7 PHEV models. The recall is necessary due to the risk of thermal events, which may cause smoke or even fires.

According to Audi, the root cause of the issue is still under investigation, but current analysis suggests that manufacturing deviations at a supplier of battery modules may be to blame. The company has been working closely with its supplier, Samsung SDI, and conducting comprehensive analyses of affected batteries to determine the conditions and circumstances that trigger thermal events.

The recall affects approximately 50 high-voltage batteries from non-U.S. markets, as well as an additional batch of batteries collected from field incidents in the United States. Audi has also received reports of other vehicles outside of these specific models, which are also under investigation.

To mitigate the risk, Audi plans to install advanced onboard diagnostic software, which will detect potential issues with battery module performance and alert the driver before problems may occur. The software is expected to be available in the second quarter of 2025.

In addition to the software update, Audi will offer two interim remedies for vehicles affected by this recall:

  1. Vehicles with online data: Affected modules or high-voltage batteries must be replaced.
  2. Vehicles without online data: Customers will be instructed not to charge their vehicle from external sources or via the combustion engine until the new software becomes available.

To date, Audi reports no injuries, crashes, or fires related to this issue in the United States market. Interim letters notifying owners of the safety risk will be mailed on January 24, 2025, with a second notice to follow once the final remedy is available.

Vehicles Affected:

  • 2022-2023 Audi Q5 PHEV
  • 2022 Audi A7 PHEV

Recall Numbers:

  • Volkswagen’s number: 93AA
  • NHTSA campaign number: 24V-898

Interim Remedies:

  1. Vehicles with online data: Replacement of affected modules or high-voltage batteries.
  2. Vehicles without online data: Instructed not to charge vehicle from external sources or via combustion engine until new software becomes available.

Jeep Wrangler 4XE The Jeep Wrangler 4XE plug-in hybrid has faced a series of challenges that have left many owners questioning the reliability of their vehicles. Reports from owners highlight a range of issues, from stalling engines that cannot be restarted to transmission errors, battery defects, and more serious safety concerns.

One common complaint among Wrangler 4XE owners is the vehicle’s tendency to stall unexpectedly, leaving drivers unable to restart the car. This issue is not just inconvenient but poses a significant safety risk, especially if it occurs in traffic or remote areas. Additionally, there have been reports of defective batteries and blown fuses, further contributing to the vehicle’s unreliability.

Transmission problems are another significant issue, with some owners experiencing leaks and errors, alongside instances where the shifter becomes stuck in park, rendering the vehicle immobile. Warning lights, such as the check engine light and power steering light, frequently accompany these mechanical failures, along with messages indicating the need to “Service Electronic Stability.”

Charging issues have also been a point of frustration. Errors like “Service Charging System” have been reported, alongside malfunctions in the Power Inverter Module (PIM), further complicating the ownership experience. In some cases, these electrical issues lead to a complete loss of power, preventing the vehicle from starting.

More alarming are reports of oil leaks from the exhaust and rear undercarriage, with one vehicle diagnosed with a bad pinion seal on the rear axle at merely 241 miles on the odometer. The recurrence of such leaks, accompanied by smoke and the potential risk of fire, underscores the severity of the Wrangler 4XE’s problems.

The erratic behavior of the vehicle’s transmission and propulsion systems, including sudden stops in the middle of highways and unintended acceleration that has led to property damage, raises significant concerns about the safety and reliability of the Jeep Wrangler 4XE.

For owners facing these daunting issues, California’s Lemon Law provides a beacon of hope. This law is designed to protect consumers who have purchased or leased new vehicles covered by a manufacturer’s new vehicle warranty. If a vehicle proves to be defective and cannot be repaired after a reasonable number of attempts, the manufacturer is required to either replace the vehicle or refund the purchase price to the consumer.

Under the California Lemon Law, owners of the Jeep Wrangler 4XE experiencing repeated failures that substantially impair the vehicle’s use, value, or safety may be entitled to relief. It’s essential for affected owners to keep detailed records of all repairs and attempts made to address the issues, as these documents will be crucial in pursuing a lemon law claim.

The myriad of problems faced by Jeep Wrangler 4XE owners highlights the challenges in the automotive industry’s shift towards electrification, especially in models that are expected to perform under the demanding conditions for which Jeeps are renowned. For those grappling with these defects, understanding and utilizing the protections offered by the Lemon Law can provide a pathway to resolution and ensure that manufacturers are held accountable for the reliability and safety of their vehicles.