Subaru has decided that a safety defect could affect certain 2026 Subaru Forester vehicles. According to Subaru, some vehicles were built with an incorrect or improperly oriented rear gate stay bracket, which could cause the rear hatch support stay to suddenly detach — without any warning to the driver or passengers.

What Is the Defect?

The problem involves the rear gate stay bracket, a component that helps support the rear hatch when it is open.  Affected vehicles may have:

  • An incorrect rear gate stay bracket, or
  • A bracket that was installed in the wrong orientation

Either condition can cause the rear gate stay to detach unexpectedly during use.

Why This Is Dangerous

If the rear gate stay detaches without warning, the rear hatch can suddenly lose support. This creates a serious risk of:

  • Head and upper-body injuries
  • Crush injuries to hands or arms
  • Potential injuries to children, passengers, or anyone loading cargo

How Subaru Discovered the Problem

  • October 28, 2025: During in-process inspection, Subaru found a vehicle built with an incorrect rear gate stay bracket.
  • Additional inspections revealed more vehicles with either:
    • Incorrect brackets, or
    • Brackets installed backwards or in the wrong orientation.
  • October 29 – December 10, 2025: Subaru launched a formal investigation and conducted repeated open/close cycle testing.
  • While initial tests did not show failures, Subaru concluded that longer-term real-world use could lead to stay detachment without warning.
  • December 11, 2025: Out of caution, Subaru decided to issue a safety recall.

Subaru admitted the root cause was a faulty work instruction process that failed to ensure the correct bracket was installed in the proper orientation.

Vehicles Affected

  • Model: 2026 Subaru Forester
  • Recall Number: WRG-25
  • NHTSA Campaign Number: 25V-889
  • Owner Notification Letters: Expected to be mailed February 16, 2026

What Will Dealers Do?

Subaru dealerships will:

  • Inspect the rear hatch support bracket
  • Replace the rear gate stay and support bracket if any defect or mis-installation is found

Repairs are expected to be performed at no cost to owners.

What This Means for Lemon Law Claims

Even though Subaru says no injuries have occurred, this defect involves a safety-critical system and was serious enough to justify a federal recall.

You may have a valid Lemon Law claim if:

  • Your vehicle experiences repeat repair attempts
  • The rear hatch detaches or becomes unsafe
  • Your vehicle is out of service for an extended period
  • The defect substantially impairs the use, value, or safety of your Forester

Lemon laws protect consumers when manufacturers are unable to permanently fix serious safety defects within a reasonable number of attempts.

What Owners Should Do Now

  • Watch for Subaru’s recall letter in mid-February 2026
  • Schedule your inspection as soon as possible
  • Keep all repair orders and service records
  • If problems continue after repair, contact a Lemon Law attorney immediately

Final Thoughts

The 2026 Subaru Forester rear hatch recall highlights how even a small manufacturing error can create a serious safety hazard. A rear gate stay that detaches without warning is not a minor inconvenience — it is a potential injury-causing defect.

If your Forester has this issue and Subaru cannot repair it properly, your vehicle may qualify as a lemon.

Owners of certain 2016–2020 Acura ILX vehicles may be experiencing an unsettling brake issue that develops quietly over time. While it does not always appear suddenly or trigger warning lights, the condition can reduce brake effectiveness during everyday driving—particularly during gentle or slow brake applications.  For drivers, any issue involving braking deserves close attention.

What Is the Brake Problem?

The issue centers on the brake master cylinder, a critical component responsible for converting pedal pressure into braking force. In the affected vehicles, a material used in the brake fluid reservoir hose can release excess plasticizer into the brake fluid.

Over time, this contamination causes a seal inside the master cylinder (known as the secondary cup seal) to swell and deform. Heat from the engine can make the problem worse.

When this happens:

  • Brake fluid can bypass the seal instead of building proper pressure
  • The brake pedal may feel softer or less firm
  • Stopping distances may increase, especially during light or gradual braking

In real-world driving, this means the vehicle may not slow down as expected—raising the risk of a crash or injury.

Why Did This Happen?

The root cause traces back to manufacturing timing. The brake reservoir hose was installed too soon after production, before excess plasticizer had time to dissipate. That plasticizer leached into the brake fluid, which was then absorbed by the master cylinder seal.

As the seal absorbed the contaminant and expanded:

  • Its shape and flexibility changed
  • It could no longer maintain a proper seal under certain braking conditions
  • Brake fluid was allowed to leak back into the reservoir

The result is reduced hydraulic pressure when the driver presses the brake pedal slowly.

A Long Investigation Timeline

Honda and Acura engineers spent nearly a decade analyzing this issue:

  • 2015–2021: Initial complaints of intermittent brake pedal pressure loss
  • 2022–2024: Extensive testing confirmed chemical contamination and seal swelling
  • 2025: A clear link was found between hose storage timing, material curing, and seal deformation

By late 2025, the manufacturer determined that this condition posed a motor vehicle safety defect and initiated corrective action.

As of December 2025, there were 192 warranty claims associated with the issue. Fortunately, no injuries or fatalities have been reported.

What Is Being Done to Fix It?

Owners of affected vehicles will be notified by mail and instructed to visit an authorized Acura dealer. The repair involves:

  • Replacing the brake master cylinder
  • Installing an improved sealing cup made from a different material
  • Restoring proper brake fluid sealing and pedal feel

This updated design is intended to eliminate the contamination-related swelling entirely.

Why This Matters for Lemon Law Claims

Even if a manufacturer offers a fix, brake-related defects can still be relevant under Lemon Law statutes, especially if:

  • The problem existed during the warranty period.
  • You experienced repeated brake complaints or repairs.
  • The issue affected vehicle safety, drivability, or value.

Recall Reference: VW Campaign 93EV / NHTSA Campaign 25V-836

If you are the owner of a 2023 or 2024 Volkswagen ID.4, please take a moment to review this critical safety warning. Volkswagen has issued a recall for specific vehicles in this model range due to a high-voltage battery defect that could lead to a vehicle fire.

Because the risk involves the potential for a thermal event (fire) while the car is parked or driving, Volkswagen has issued specific “Park Outside” instructions while they prepare the remedy.

The Issue With The VW ID.4 Battery

The problem lies within the High Voltage (HV) battery. According to the defect report, a production deviation at a battery supplier resulted in misaligned electrodes within certain battery cell modules.  Specifically, the cathode inside the battery cell may have shifted. When these electrodes are not aligned correctly, it increases the risk of a short circuit inside the cell, which can lead to a fire.

Warning Signs

While a battery fire can happen suddenly, there are performance indicators you should watch for. If your vehicle has this defect, you may experience:

  • A noticeable loss of driving range.
  • A reduction in vehicle performance.

If you notice these issues, contact an authorized Volkswagen dealer immediately for diagnosis.

Critical Safety Instructions for Owners

Until the recall repair is performed, Volkswagen is advising owners of affected vehicles to follow these strict precautions to minimize risk:

  1. Park Outside: Park the vehicle away from structures and other cars immediately after charging.
  2. No Overnight Indoor Charging: Do not leave the vehicle charging indoors overnight.
  3. Limit Charge to 80%: Adjust your charging settings to stop at an 80% state of charge.
  4. Avoid Fast Charging: Do not use Level 3 DC Fast Chargers.

Timeline: How the Defect Was Discovered

The investigation into this issue spanned nearly two years. Here is a summary of the events that led to this recall:

  • January 2024 (Illinois): Volkswagen was notified of the first thermal event involving a vehicle connected to a Level 3 DC charger. The battery was analyzed, confirming the fire started in the HV battery.
  • July & October 2024 (California): Two separate fires occurred in parked vehicles that were not charging. Inspections confirmed the origin was the HV battery, but initial analysis (including CT scans by the supplier in June 2025) failed to identify the root cause.
  • December 2024 (Utah): A fourth thermal event occurred while a vehicle was being driven.
  • Summer 2025: With CT scans appearing inconclusive, VW and the supplier investigated other potential causes outside the battery but found nothing. The focus returned to the battery.
  • August 2025 (Colorado): A fifth event occurred while a vehicle was using a DC fast charger.
  • September 2025 (The Breakthrough): The supplier performed a physical “tear-down” analysis of damaged cell modules. They discovered the “shifted” electrode condition. By comparing this physical evidence back to the previous CT images, they realized the defect was visible in the scans but had been previously unrecognized.
  • November 2025: The supplier identified the specific batch of bad modules, allowing VW to isolate which vehicles were affected. On November 26, VW officially decided to issue a recall.

The Remedy

Dealers will resolve this issue by replacing the high-voltage battery cell modules as necessary. Owner Notification: Notification letters are expected to be mailed by January 30, 2026.

  • Volkswagen Recall Number: 93EV
  • NHTSA Campaign Number: 25V-836

Hyundai Santa Fe Bank Display Screen

If you own a model year 2024 or 2025 Hyundai Santa Fe or Santa Fe Hybrid, you need to be aware of a significant safety recall affecting your vehicle’s backup camera system.

Hyundai Motor America has determined that a defect exists in certain vehicles where the rear view camera image may fail to display when the vehicle is placed in reverse. This issue has triggered a noncompliance recall because the affected vehicles fail to meet the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) number 111 regarding “Rear Visibility.”

Here is everything owners need to know about why the cameras are failing, the safety risks involved, and how Hyundai plans to fix the problem.

What is Causing the Santa Fe Camera Failure?

It is frustrating when a new car feature stops working. In this case, the problem isn’t necessarily a defective camera lens, but rather how the camera system was installed at the factory.

According to investigations by Hyundai’s Safety Test and Investigation Laboratory (STIL), the root cause stems from improper installation of the rear view camera wiring harness.

During the manufacturing process, variations in how the “end-of-line” wire harnesses were packaged allowed for inconsistencies in cable routing. In some vehicles, the camera wiring harnesses were installed with a “twist.” This twisting creates increased tension on the wires.

Over time, this tension can cause physical damage to the wiring, including solder cracks near terminal connections and damage to the wire’s shield line. Once these wires are compromised, the connection becomes unstable, leading to a flickering image or a completely blank screen on your dashboard display.

Why This Is a Safety Issue

A functional rear view camera is vital for safe reversing. It helps drivers spot pedestrians, obstacles, and other vehicles in their blind spots.

When the camera fails to display an image, the driver loses this critical view. This noncompliance with FMVSS No. 111 increases the risk of a crash or backup collision.

The Investigation Timeline

Hyundai began looking into this issue between March and June 2025 after routine monitoring of warranty claims showed a spike in inoperative cameras. They analyzed 21 different camera assemblies, discovering the solder cracks and wiring damage. Following extensive review with the supplier and Hyundai’s North America Safety Decision Authority in November 2025, the decision was made to issue a recall.

The Fix: What Hyundai Will Do

  1. Replace the rear view camera assembly entirely.
  2. Reposition the wiring harness correctly to ensure there is no tension causing damage to the new unit.

Important Dates and Next Steps for Owners

If you own a 2024-2025 Santa Fe or Santa Fe Hybrid, keep an eye on your mail.

  • Owner Notification: Hyundai expects to mail notification letters to affected owners beginning January 19, 2026.

If your camera is currently not working, you do not need to wait for the letter to contact your dealer.

Essential Recall Reference Numbers

When speaking with your dealer or searching the NHTSA database, use these reference numbers to identify this specific issue:

  • Hyundai Recall Number: 288
  • NHTSA Campaign Number: 25V-808

Ford has decided that a safety defect exists involving the high-voltage battery packs inside certain plug-in hybrid vehicles—specifically the 2020–2024 Ford Escape PHEV and 2021–2024 Lincoln Corsair PHEV.  At the center of the issue is a manufacturing defect inside one or more battery cells, which can lead to an internal short circuit and, in the worst cases, battery thermal venting or vehicle shutdown.

This problem originally surfaced years ago, was addressed by a previous recall, and now—based on new field data—Ford has determined that the prior fix may not have been enough.

What’s Causing the Problem?

Inside the high-voltage battery pack, each cell has a separator layer that keeps the cathode and anode apart. If this thin separator layer becomes damaged, the cell can short internally.  Ford, its engineering teams, and the battery cell supplier have all pointed to variability in the supplier’s production process as the likely cause. This inconsistency may lead to small imperfections or weaknesses in the separator layer.

When the separator is compromised, the result can be:

  • Internal short circuits
  • Loss of propulsion power
  • Battery overheating
  • Thermal venting
  • Potential vehicle fire

Ford has not yet identified the complete root cause. Tear down investigations are still ongoing.

Safety Risks: What Can Happen

If a battery cell shorts internally:

1. Loss of Motive Power While Driving

The vehicle may suddenly shut down its propulsion system.
A red “Stop Safely Now” warning appears on the instrument cluster.

Although steering, braking, and lights still work, a sudden loss of acceleration dramatically increases crash and injury risk.

2. Battery Thermal Venting / Fire Risk

A shorted cell can overheat and vent hot gas, which can ignite surrounding components.
This is a significant safety hazard, particularly if venting occurs during or after charging.

To date, Ford reports no injuries or accidents connected to this defect.

A Look Back: The 24V-954 / 24S79 Recall

Ford already attempted to fix this issue once.

In December 2024, Ford approved recall 24V-954 (Ford) / 24S79 (Lincoln), which rolled out the following remedy:

  • Updated Battery Energy Control Module (BECM) software
  • Added enhanced detection of battery cell anomalies
  • Stopped battery charging automatically if anomalies were detected
  • Alerted owners through messages in the instrument cluster

This fix was intended to catch separator-layer damage before it caused a short circuit.  However, new field reports show this strategy was not always effective.

The Turning Point: New Thermal Venting Cases in 2025

July–August 2025

Three European Ford Kuga PHEV vehicles (the Kuga is the European variant of the Escape PHEV) experienced battery thermal venting even AFTER receiving the recall software update.

September 2025

Two more cases surfaced.

August–October 2025 Investigation

Ford’s Critical Concern Review Group (CCRG) opened a formal investigation on August 27, 2025.
Recovered battery packs and control modules showed:

  • No detectable anomalies before venting
  • Significant thermal damage making root-cause confirmation difficult
  • The updated software did NOT trigger any warnings prior to failure

Meanwhile, tear down analysis from other replaced battery packs (those that were flagged by the software and did not vent) has not yet identified a definitive cause.

As of November 5, 2025

Ford reports:

  • 7 total venting incidents, all from European Kuga PHEV vehicles
  • All had already received the 24V-954 software update
  • No injuries or accidents

November 7, 2025

Ford approved a new field action—leading to today’s recall.

The New Recall: 25SC4 (Ford) / 25V-789 (NHTSA)

Because of the new cases, Ford has issued a new recall to replace the old one.

Affected Vehicles:

  • 2020–2024 Ford Escape Plug-In Hybrid
  • 2021–2024 Lincoln Corsair Plug-In Hybrid
    (These vehicles were previously included in recall 24V-954.)

Ford’s New Instructions to Owners

Until the final fix is ready, Ford advises:

  • Only use Auto EV mode
  • Limit the maximum charge of the high-voltage battery
  • Wait for mailed instructions and further updates

Interim owner letters are scheduled to go out December 1, 2025, detailing the safety risks and how to limit battery charging.  A second letter will follow once a permanent remedy is available.

The Final Remedy Is Still Under Development

Ford has not yet determined what the permanent fix will look like—likely because the underlying defect is still not fully understood.

Conclusion

Ford’s latest recall highlights an unresolved and potentially serious defect in the high-voltage battery cells used in its Escape and Corsair plug-in hybrid models. The original software-based solution from 2024 was not enough to catch every instance of cell separator damage, and new thermal-venting cases have forced Ford to develop a more comprehensive fix.  Until that final remedy is completed, owners must limit charging, follow Ford’s interim instructions, and watch for important recall notices.

Ford Bronco Blank Display

Ford has announced a safety recall for certain 2025–2026 Ford Bronco and Bronco Sport models after discovering a software defect that can cause the instrument panel cluster (IPC) to fail at startup. While the failure rate appears low so far, the issue can disable the display of critical safety information—and that creates a significant risk for drivers.

The Problem:  A Startup Timing Error That Can Blank the Instrument Panel

The Instrument Panel Cluster (IPC) is responsible for displaying essential vehicle information, including speed, engine warnings, braking system alerts, and other important safety telltales.

In the affected vehicles, the IPC can fail to initialize at startup. When that happens, the screen stays completely blank.

The Root Cause

Ford traced the issue to a timing-related software fault:

  • During the IPC’s sleep-entry sequence, there is a narrow window where a CAN wake-up interrupt can occur.
  • If this interrupt happens at the wrong moment, it triggers a memory protection fault in the cluster’s control unit.
  • The result: the IPC fails to boot, leaving the driver with a blank screen.

A blank cluster means no speedometer, no warning lights, and no safety indicators, which can significantly increase the risk of a crash if the vehicle is driven in that condition.

Why This Matters for Drivers

If the IPC is blank when the vehicle starts:

  • The driver cannot see speed, engine warnings, brake indicators, turn signals, or safety alerts.
  • Important telltales required under federal safety regulations may not display.
  • The driver loses critical information needed for safe operation.

Although the vehicle can still move, driving without a functioning instrument panel is dangerous—especially in traffic, at night, or in poor weather conditions.

Ford reports no accidents or injuries linked to this defect as of November 2025, but the potential safety impact is clear.

Ford’s Internal Investigation Timeline

The issue first surfaced on September 18, 2025, when reports of blank screens in 2025–2026 Broncos and Bronco Sports were escalated to Ford’s Critical Concern Review Group (CCRG). Over the next several weeks, the CCRG analyzed failure reports, warranty data, and comparisons to a similar prior recall (25S88 / 25V-540).

What they found was significant:

  • Warranty claims were low so far, but
  • 68% of connected vehicles had ignition cycles falling within the window of susceptibility to this startup timing failure—almost identical to the earlier recall population.
  • No clear factor suggested the newer vehicles were at lower risk than the previously recalled models.

The first warranty claim was logged on May 15, 2025, and by November 7, 2025, Ford had documented 12 potentially related claims.

On that same date—November 7—the Field Review Committee approved a formal field action, confirming the need for a recall.

Which Vehicles Are Affected?

Ford has issued a recall for certain:

  • 2025 Ford Bronco
  • 2025 Ford Bronco Sport
  • 2026 Ford Bronco
  • 2026 Ford Bronco Sport

These vehicles are equipped with the susceptible SX2 Instrument Panel Cluster.

Ford’s recall number is 25SC3, and the corresponding NHTSA campaign number is 25V-788.

How the Problem Will Be Fixed

Ford will correct the IPC issue through an instrument panel cluster software update, available:

  • At Ford dealerships, or
  • Through an over-the-air (OTA) update (for vehicles equipped to receive OTA updates)
  • Ford plans to begin mailing recall notices on December 8, 2025.

What Bronco and Bronco Sport Owners Should Do

If your instrument panel cluster ever boots up blank:

  1. Do not drive the vehicle until the IPC initializes correctly.
  2. If your Ford Bronco is affected, contact your Ford dealer to schedule a repair.
  3. Check for OTA update availability.
  4. Monitor for recall notifications and verify your VIN’s status on Ford’s recall lookup page.

Even if you haven’t experienced the issue yet, your vehicle may still be at risk due to the timing-related nature of the fault.

If You Continue to Experience IPC Problems

If the problem persists after the recall repair—or if Ford is unable to fix the defect—owners may be eligible for repurchase, replacement, or compensation, according to California Lemon Laws.

If you drive a Cadillac Escalade, Chevrolet Tahoe, Suburban, Silverado 1500, GMC Yukon, or Sierra 1500, you may have already seen a Check Engine Light related to a coolant control valve problem.
Many 2021–2023 GM vehicles—especially those equipped with the 3.0L Duramax diesel (LM2 or LZ0)—have been affected by failures of the engine coolant control valve, sometimes called the engine coolant flow control valve.

This part plays a crucial role in regulating coolant flow to help the engine maintain proper operating temperature. When it fails or sticks, it can cause check-engine lights, overheating, and even high-speed radiator fan operation after the engine is turned off.

What the Issue Is

The engine coolant control valve manages how coolant circulates through the radiator and engine. When it fails, owners often report one or more of these diagnostic trouble codes (DTCs):

  • P1098Coolant Control Valve Performance (common on 3.0L Duramax models; fans may run at high speed even after the key is off)
  • P26BB / P2B60Coolant Flow Control Valve Position/Learn Faults

These codes can trigger the Check Engine Light (MIL) and may cause excessive fan noise or poor temperature regulation.

Vehicles Involved

GM lists the following vehicles as potentially affected:

  • 2021–2023: Cadillac Escalade, Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban, GMC Yukon / Yukon XL
  • 2021–2022: Chevrolet Silverado 1500, GMC Sierra 1500

The issue is most prevalent in vehicles with the 3.0L Duramax diesel engine (LM2 or LZ0), but can appear in some gasoline variants as well.

What GM Told Dealers to Do

General Motors has released several Technical Service Bulletins (TSBs) and Preliminary Information (PI) documents to guide technicians:

  • 22-NA-082 (April 2022) – Software programming update for vehicles displaying P1098 / P26BB / P2B60 codes.
  • PIP5791A (January 2022) – Directs technicians to command the valve open and closed multiple times to verify function before replacement.
  • Earlier PI (2019 → carried forward) – Replace the valve and perform a relearn if previous codes were logged and diagnostics confirm failure.
  • 21-NA-271 (August 2023) – Advises checking for kinked cooling hoses that can cause similar fault codes before replacing the valve.

Special Coverage Program for 3.0L Duramax Models

In September 2025, GM announced a Special Coverage Program for the coolant control valve affecting certain 3.0L Duramax models.

  • Coverage up to 15 years / 150,000 miles (240,000 km) from the vehicle’s in-service date
  • Applies to Silverado 1500, Sierra 1500, and full-size SUVs equipped with 3.0L Duramax engines
  • Covers replacement of the coolant control valve and related programming if diagnostics confirm failure.
  • Program IDs: N252508340 and N252508341

What Owners Should Do

  1. Get the codes read – Look specifically for P1098, P26BB, or P2B60.
  2. Visit your GM dealer – Mention TSB 22-NA-082 and Special Coverage N252508340/N252508341.
  3. Ask for a diagnostic and repair under warranty coverage if applicable.

California Lemon Law: Repeated Coolant Valve Problems Could Mean Your Vehicle Is a Lemon

If your GM SUV or truck has been in the shop multiple times for the repeated issues—or has been out of service for an extended period due to repeated repairs—you may have additional protection under the California Lemon Law (formally the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act).

When Lemon Law Might Apply

You may qualify if:

  • The vehicle is still under the manufacturer’s warranty (including extended “special coverage” programs).
  • The dealer has attempted several repairs for the same problem without success.
  • The issue substantially impairs the vehicle’s use, value, or safety (for example, repeated overheating or engine cooling failure).
  • The vehicle has spent a significant number of days in the shop for warranty-related repairs.

If those conditions apply, California law may require GM to repurchase or replace your vehicle.

How to Take Action

  1. Keep records of all service visits, repair orders, and communication with your dealer.
  2. Request a copy of your vehicle’s repair history and diagnostic codes.
  3. Consult a California Lemon Law attorney or consumer-protection advocate if your issue persists after repeated repairs.

(Tip: Lemon Law claims can often be handled at no cost to the consumer—attorney fees are typically paid by the manufacturer if you prevail.)

Certain model-year 2020-2025 Jeep Wrangler 4xe and 2022-2026 Jeep Grand Cherokee 4xe vehicles were manufactured with high-voltage (HV) battery packs that may contain defective cells. The defect can lead the battery to internally fail and potentially cause a vehicle fire – whether the vehicle is parked or driving.

What’s the problem?

  • On July 3, 2025, the manufacturer’s technical safety organization opened an investigation after reports of fires originating in the HV battery packs of these plug-in hybrid vehicles – including vehicles that had already undergone the earlier remedy under Recall ID 95B (NHTSA ID 24V-720).
  • The battery supplier Samsung SDI obtained a pack from a vehicle that had experienced a fire with cells manufactured outside the original recall’s scope. They found the fire was caused by the same defect identified under 95B and are working to identify additional causal factors.
  • As of October 13, 2025:
    • 9 fires reported in vehicles which had already had the 95B software remedy applied.
    • 10 fires reported in vehicles whose cells were outside the original 95B scope.
    • 19 customer-assistance records, 0 warranty claims, and 19 field reports tied to this issue (dates from Jan 27 to Sept 2, 2025).
    • 1 injury and no confirmed accidents tied to this issue.
  • On October 24, 2025, the manufacturer determined there is a defect affecting motor vehicle safety in all affected vehicles.
  • The manufacturer states that in rare cases, a battery pack may contain cells with separator damage which, combined with other complex interactions within the cell, may lead to a fire.
  • A key interim safety measure: risk is lower when the battery charge level is low or depleted, and higher when the battery is fully or highly charged.
  • Owner advice: refrain from recharging the vehicle, and park away from structures or other vehicles until the final remedy is available.
  • The recall campaign number is 68C (NHTSA campaign number 25V-741) and even vehicles previously recalled under 24V-720 or 23V-787 will need the new remedy.

Affected vehicles

  • Model year 2020-2025 Jeep Wrangler 4xe
  • Model year 2022-2026 Jeep Grand Cherokee 4xe

What should owners do now?

  1. Minimize risk until fixed:
    • Avoid charging the plug-in-hybrid battery.
    • Park the vehicle outdoors or away from other vehicles/structures (such as garages) when practicable.
    • Try to keep the battery’s state of charge as low as is reasonable for your use.
  2. Wait for the remedy: The final repair or battery replacement is under development. Interim notification letters are expected to be mailed starting December 2, 2025, with additional letters once the remedy is ready.
  3. Follow dealer instructions: Once the remedy is available, schedule service promptly. The remedy may include software updates to the battery management/control module plus potentially a full HV battery pack replacement.
  4. Stay informed: Keep track of recall updates and announcements.

Why this matters: safety & resale considerations

  • A fire originating from a plug-in hybrid’s high-voltage battery is a rare but serious risk: it can pose danger to occupants, first-responders, and bystanders, and damage property.
  • Even if your vehicle hasn’t shown signs of the defect, being part of the recall means you should treat it as a potential risk and act accordingly.
  • From a resale/ownership value perspective, vehicles under open safety recalls can be harder to sell or may need disclosure depending on local laws. Completing the remedy promptly is beneficial for overall vehicle value and peace of mind.

Bottom line

If you own a 2020-2025 Jeep Wrangler 4xe or a 2022-2026 Jeep Grand Cherokee 4xe, this is a recall you cannot ignore. While the risk may only affect a minority of vehicles, the potential consequence is serious. Until the permanent fix is installed, follow the safety advice strictly: no recharging, park away from buildings, and monitor for dealer communications. Once the remedy becomes available, book the service as soon as possible. Your safety – and the safety of others around your vehicle – depends on it.