A recent survey done by the National Association of Consumer Advocates (NACA) shows that consumer lemon law rights are being stifled as companies try to increase the use of arbitration clauses. Out of 350 consumer attorneys surveyed, 84% said that there is an increase in instances where consumer claims could not be settled or a class action law suits could not be pursued due to an arbitration clause. Approximately 90% of the attorneys surveyed said that they have turned away cases because the underlying contract had an arbitration clause included in it.

Forced arbitration clauses are fast becoming a favorite weapon for businesses as a way of distancing themselves from liability. Clauses are often mislabeled and buried in mountains of paper work, making it easy for the unsuspecting consumer to miss it. Individuals almost always lose to businesses in arbitration. Arbitration is seen as a disadvantage to consumers because:

  1. It creates an uneven playing field in the favor of the automobile manufacturer. A consumer without legal representation will find it difficult to battle an automobile manufacturer that has experience in dealing with lemon law claims.
  2. There is limited recourse for the consumer once a decision is made. The outcome of an arbitration claim can often affect decisions made in future lawsuits.
  3. Businesses are repeated users of an arbitrator, so there is an incentive for an arbitrator to rule in favor of the business if he expects future retentions.
  4. There is a lack of transparency in the proceedings of the arbitration claim.

Consumer Groups Are Fighting Back

  • The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, created by Congress in the wake of the Wall Street meltdown, recently announced a public inquiry on forced arbitration.
  • The National Association of Consumer Advocates (NACA) has launched a 50-state public education campaign aimed at teaching consumers about the dangers of forced arbitration.
  • A Public Citizen coalition called Fair Arbitration NOW are petitioning lawmakers to pass an Arbitration Fairness Act.

In the meantime, it is important to recognize that automobile manufacturers will try to force arbitration. You should carefully read any contracts before signing and try to negotiate arbitration clauses out of the contract. If a company tries to force an arbitration clause on you, you may want to take your business elsewhere.

Porsche has announced that they will be recalling almost 300 Panamera and Cayenne vehicles for a manufacturing error that could lead to a fire. According to Porsche, a casting defect of the turbocharger turbine wheel could cause it to fracture resulting in damage to the turbine shaft. If the shaft should fracture, oil could be drawn into the exhaust system resulting in smoke and the risk of a fire. Porsche will be notifying owners of the problem, this month, and will replace the defective turbine wheel, free of charge. Owners wanting more information on the problem can contact Porsche at 1-800-767-7243. The vehicles involved in this recall include:

Safety advocates encouraging a recall of certain 2002-2004 Ford Escape vehicles are also asking the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to include the 2002-2004 Mazda Tribute in their investigation. According to the group, both sport utility vehicles (SUV) are similar vehicles built on the same assembly line. In 2004 Ford and Mazda issued identical recalls for unintended acceleration caused by an accelerator cable that may not return to the idle position. Ford later issued a technical service bulletin that warned dealers that an improper repair could lead to an adjacent cruise control cable being damaged and snagging on the engine cover causing unintended acceleration. The Center for Auto Safety say that because the vehicles are so similar and there is no way of knowing whether the recalls were carried out correctly, Ford and Mazda should issue a recall to ensure the safety of the vehicles.

The Center for Auto Safety (CAS) is encouraging the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to open an investigation into certain 2002-2004 Ford Escape vehicles that could be susceptible to unintended acceleration after being repaired for another recall. According to the consumer safety group, the original recall involved accelerator cables snagging on the accelerator pedals, preventing the engine from returning to idle. The group says that almost a year later, Ford issued a technical service bulletin (TSB) which cautioned dealers to take extra care when correcting the recall because the adjacent cruise control cable could be damaged in the process. The damage could allow the cable to snag on a ridge in the engine cover causing unintended acceleration. There have been over 130 complaints from owners claiming they experienced sudden acceleration before and after the original recall was performed. The recall petition also mentions a case in Payson, Ariz., where a 17 year old died in a crash that was blamed on a snagged cruise control cable. According to Ford, they are currently working with the NHTSA to investigate the problem.

Every automobile manufacturer is subject to repeated problems related to the safety, value, or use of their vehicles, and Chevrolet is no exception. There have been over 16,000 complaints on file for Chevy vehicles, with the Impala, Malibu, Silverado, Trailblazer, Cavalier, Equinox and Cobalt topping the list. Some of these problem are as simple as updates to the owners manual, but many of them can seriously affect the safety of the vehicle, putting the vehicle occupants and others on the road in danger.

In order to protect consumers against defective vehicles, the federal government enacted the Magnusson Moss Act. Every state has their own version of the lemon laws, and California is no exception. California’s Lemon Laws were enacted in 1970 and were founded in the Song Beverly Consumer Warranty Act. The law states that if a manufacturer cannot fix a defective car, truck, boat, RV, motor home, or motorcycle after a reasonable number of repair attempts, the vehicle must be replaced or refunded. Generally, the manufacturer is responsible to re-purchase or replace the defective vehicle.

If you live in California and think that your vehicle could be a lemon, contact the Law Offices of Delsack & Associates at 1.888.395.3666 or go to LemonLawSpecialists.com for a free consultation. You have nothing to loose but your lemon.

BMW is recalling certain 2011 1-Series Active E an 2012 Z4 vehicle because drivers could experience sudden loss of power steering assist. Variations in electrical currents occurring within the power steering assist system could lead to sudden loss of power steering increasing the effort needed to maneuver the vehicle. Difficulty in steering could increase the chance of the driver getting into an accident. BMW will be notifying owners starting in July and will replace the steering assistance module free of charge. Owners wanting more information about the problem can contact BMW customer relations at 1-800-525-7417.

General Motors (GM) new marketing plan aimed at clearing out remaining inventory of Chevrolet vehicles, will allow customers to return their vehicle for a refund if they are not satisfied with their purchase. Chevrolet’s “Love It or Return It” offer will allow customers of any new 2012 and 2013 model year vehicles, to a full refund as long as there is fewer than 4,000 miles and the customer has driven the vehicle for at least 30 days.

Buyers who choose to return their vehicle will get all their money back, including sales tax. Unfortunately, expenses such as any additional taxes, licensing, registration and extras such as extended warranties will still have to be paid by the customer. GM hopes the plan will encourage customers to give Chevrolet vehicles a try, winning back some of the market share lost to import oriented markets. The promotion will be offered until Sept. 4, 2012.

General Motors (GM) have announced a recall for certain 2012 Chevrolet Captiva sport passenger vehicles because they may fail to conform to the park brake performance requirements of the federal motor vehicle safety standards. According to the recall report, the park brake cable may not be fully seated and could separate from its connector. The park brake could become inoperative and the vehicle could roll away unexpectedly. Dealers will inspect and secured the cable as necessary. Owners wanting more information on the problem can contact the Chevrolet owner center at 1-866-694-6546.