Chrysler has released a technical service bulletin (TSB) alerting Jeep dealers, owners, and employees of Jeep Death Wobble, and have issued procedures on how to repair and prevent the problem. Death Wobble has been a problem in certain 2005-2010 Jeep Wranglers since November 2010 after hundreds of drivers complained of experiencing shimmy symptoms at speeds above 45 mph, after hitting a pothole. The highest number of complaints came from owners of 2007 models.

The bulletin advises that the steering system be inspected regularly for damaged, especially if the system has not been maintained. Chrysler warns owner that the installation of aftermarket steering and suspension components or wheel and tire assembles incompatible with Jeeps is the biggest cause of steering system vibration. There has been no reported deaths related to the problem, but owners experiencing the wobble have been justified in being frightened for their safety and the safety of others on the road.

A recent survey done by the National Association of Consumer Advocates (NACA) shows that consumer lemon law rights are being stifled as companies try to increase the use of arbitration clauses. Out of 350 consumer attorneys surveyed, 84% said that there is an increase in instances where consumer claims could not be settled or a class action law suits could not be pursued due to an arbitration clause. Approximately 90% of the attorneys surveyed said that they have turned away cases because the underlying contract had an arbitration clause included in it.

Forced arbitration clauses are fast becoming a favorite weapon for businesses as a way of distancing themselves from liability. Clauses are often mislabeled and buried in mountains of paper work, making it easy for the unsuspecting consumer to miss it. Individuals almost always lose to businesses in arbitration. Arbitration is seen as a disadvantage to consumers because:

  1. It creates an uneven playing field in the favor of the automobile manufacturer. A consumer without legal representation will find it difficult to battle an automobile manufacturer that has experience in dealing with lemon law claims.
  2. There is limited recourse for the consumer once a decision is made. The outcome of an arbitration claim can often affect decisions made in future lawsuits.
  3. Businesses are repeated users of an arbitrator, so there is an incentive for an arbitrator to rule in favor of the business if he expects future retentions.
  4. There is a lack of transparency in the proceedings of the arbitration claim.

Consumer Groups Are Fighting Back

  • The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, created by Congress in the wake of the Wall Street meltdown, recently announced a public inquiry on forced arbitration.
  • The National Association of Consumer Advocates (NACA) has launched a 50-state public education campaign aimed at teaching consumers about the dangers of forced arbitration.
  • A Public Citizen coalition called Fair Arbitration NOW are petitioning lawmakers to pass an Arbitration Fairness Act.

In the meantime, it is important to recognize that automobile manufacturers will try to force arbitration. You should carefully read any contracts before signing and try to negotiate arbitration clauses out of the contract. If a company tries to force an arbitration clause on you, you may want to take your business elsewhere.

Every automobile manufacturer is subject to repeated problems related to the safety, value, or use of their vehicles, and Chevrolet is no exception. There have been over 16,000 complaints on file for Chevy vehicles, with the Impala, Malibu, Silverado, Trailblazer, Cavalier, Equinox and Cobalt topping the list. Some of these problem are as simple as updates to the owners manual, but many of them can seriously affect the safety of the vehicle, putting the vehicle occupants and others on the road in danger.

In order to protect consumers against defective vehicles, the federal government enacted the Magnusson Moss Act. Every state has their own version of the lemon laws, and California is no exception. California’s Lemon Laws were enacted in 1970 and were founded in the Song Beverly Consumer Warranty Act. The law states that if a manufacturer cannot fix a defective car, truck, boat, RV, motor home, or motorcycle after a reasonable number of repair attempts, the vehicle must be replaced or refunded. Generally, the manufacturer is responsible to re-purchase or replace the defective vehicle.

If you live in California and think that your vehicle could be a lemon, contact the Law Offices of Delsack & Associates at 1.888.395.3666 or go to LemonLawSpecialists.com for a free consultation. You have nothing to loose but your lemon.

California Lemon Law Buybacks

The Law Offices of Delsack & Associates represents clients to the highest legal standards. With over 24 years of California Lemon Law experience, we have successfully represented thousands of clients throughout the state in all types of lemon law cases. We take pride in the fact that almost 100% of our cases are able to reach settlements without litigation, making the process fast and stress free for our clients. Our goal is not to be the “largest” lemon law firm in California, but to continue to be the “BEST”. Below is a list of some of our most recent success stories where we helped consumers get settlements for their lemon vehicles:

  • 1. 2008 Ferrari: Replacement – Woodside, CA – 6,931 miles
  • 2. 2011 Chevrolet Aveo: Buyback – Morro Bay, CA – 6486 miles
  • 3. 2011 Chrysler 300: Buyback – Los Angeles, CA – 700 miles
  • 4. 2009 Nissan Versa: Buyback – Malibu, CA – 20,749 miles
  • 5. 2008 Ford F350: Cash & Keep – Murietta, CA – 62,302 miles
  • 6. 2010 Chevrolet Traverse: Buyback – La Quinta, CA – 42,747 miles
  • 7. 2010 Ford F150: Buyback – Menifee, CA – 24,222 miles
  • 8. 2010 Audi A420T: Cash & Keep – Carlsbad, CA – 18,024 miles
  • 9. 2010 Mercedes-Benz C63: Buyback – Laguna Beach, CA – 26,660 miles
  • 10. 2011 Dodge Grand Caravan: Buyback – San Jose, CA – 10,078 miles
  • 11. 2011 Jeep Wrangler: Buyback – Chino, CA – 7,821 miles
  • 12. 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe: Buyback – Brentwood, CA – 35,661 miles
  • 13. 2008 Honda Civic: Buyback – Studio City, CA – 52,407 miles
  • 14. 2011 Hyundai Sonata: Buyback – Porter Ranch, CA – 12,074 miles
  • 15. 2008 Volkswagen Jetta: Buyback – San Jose, CA – 45,921 miles

If you live in California and and think your vehicle could be a lemon, contact our Lemon Law Offices, or fill out our Lemon Law Case Review, for a FREE consultation.

Anywhere in California (free call): 1.888.ExLemon (1-888-395-3666)

  • California Lemon Law in Los Angeles: 310-475-1700
  • California Lemon Law in San Francisco: 415-285-5366
  • California Lemon Law in San Diego: 619-229-6900
  • California Lemon Law in Orange County: 949-856-4333
  • California Lemon Law in Palm Springs: 760-395-1000
  • California Lemon Law in San Fernando Valley: 818-837-0500

Some California lemon law attorneys believe that it is possible to get a privately bought automobile refunded under the California lemon law by getting the seller to “sell” their Lemon Law rights with the sale of the vehicle. The California Lemon Law states that the vehicle must be purchased from someone who is an authorized dealer in order for the laws to apply. Unless there is a legal agreement that states otherwise, a private sale is always “AS IS”.

When buying a vehicle privately, you are hoping that the seller is honest in telling you the condition of the car. Some states may require the seller to fill out an odometer statement and have the vehicle pass emissions testing, but it is beneficial to you to get the vehicle checked out by a mechanic as well. Still, there are no guarantees. This does not mean that every privately sold vehicle is going to be a lemon, because there are good ones out there, but if you do buy a “lemon”, in most cases, it is your loss. Every situation is unique and if you believe that you have a legitimate lemon law case, a consultation with a lemon law lawyer experienced in your state laws can help you decide how to proceed .

The Law Offices of Delsack & Associates represents clients to the highest legal standards. With over 24 years of California Lemon Law experience, we have successfully represented thousands of clients throughout the state in all types of lemon law cases. We take pride in the fact that almost 100% of our cases are able to reach satisfactory settlements without litigation, making the process fast and stress free for our clients. Our goal is not to be the “largest” lemon law firm in California, but to continue to be the “BEST”. Below is a list of some of our most recent success stories where we helped consumers get settlements for their lemon vehicles:

  • 1. 2008 Audi RS4: Full buyback – Hesperia, CA – 50,409 miles
  • 2. 2008 Chevrolet Tahoe: Cash & Keep – Clovis, CA – 45,187 miles
  • 3. 2007 Volkswagen Passat: Full buyback – Ramona, CA – 45,481 miles
  • 4. 2011 Hyundai Sonata: Full buyback – Walnut, CA – 5,226 miles
  • 5. 2010 BMW 550IA: Full buyback – Fountain Valley, CA – 27,107 miles
  • 6. 2009 Mercedes Benz GL550: Full buyback – Wilcox, CA – 41,619 miles
  • 7. 2009 Audi A4: Cash and Keep – Sherman Oaks, CA – 32,240 miles
  • 8. 2006 Saab Aero: Full buyback – Sierre Madre, CA – 75,351 miles
  • 9. 2011 Dodge Ram 2500: Full buyback – Arvin, CA – 7,577 miles
  • 10. 2006 Dodge Ram 3500: Full buyback – Cypress, CA – 67,695 miles
  • 11. 2009 Honda Civic LX: Full buyback – Torrance, CA – 13,325 miles
  • 12. 2010 Nissan Murano: Cash & Keep – Yorba Linda, CA – 21,270 miles
  • 13. 2010 Jaguar XF: Full buyback – Chino Hills, CA – 16,058 miles
  • 14. 2008 Smart 2D Passion: Full buyback – Oakland, CA – 39,637 miles
  • 15. 2011 BMW 550i: Full buyback – West Hollywood, CA – 15,206 miles
  • 16. 2010 Chrysler 300: Cash and Keep – Beverly Hills, CA – 24,825 miles

If you live in California and and think your vehicle could be a lemon, contact our Lemon Law Offices, or fill out our Lemon Law Case Review, for a FREE consultation.

Anywhere in California (free call): 1.888.ExLemon (395.3666)

  • California Lemon Law in Los Angeles: 310-475-1700
  • California Lemon Law in San Francisco: 415-285-5366
  • California Lemon Law in San Diego: 619-229-6900
  • California Lemon Law in Orange County: 949-856-4333
  • California Lemon Law in Palm Springs: 760-395-1000
  • California Lemon Law in San Fernando Valley: 818-837-0500

A Los Angeles County judge has reversed a court decision to award a former attorney almost $10,000 over fuel economy claims for her 2006 Honda Civic. The case received national attention last year, when Heather Peters opted out of a class action settlement that would have paid Civic hybrid owners up to $200 or $1000 off the purchase of a new car. Honda appealed the court decision, and Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Dudley W. Gray reversed the small-claims judgment last Thursday.

According to Gray, the automaker was within its rights to advertise the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) fuel economy ratings for the vehicle and rejects the idea that it was misleading. He added that Federal regulations control the fuel economy ratings posted on vehicles, but they are only there for comparison among vehicles and don’t take into account conditions that could affect fuel economy such as how people drive and the condition of their vehicle.

Peters lawsuit has prompted almost 40 other Civic owners to seek similar recourse. Honda has already won 18 of the suits and has lost one case, in Santa Barbara, involving a 2003 Civic hybrid. Peters said that although she is disappointed with the final ruling, she is glad she raised awareness that Honda is no longer the great brand it used to be.

Buy Here Pay Here” (BHPH) automobile sales are under attack by a new bill that hopes to regulate business practices of these car dealerships. A recent article in the Los Angeles Times stated that 20% of all used car purchases in the U.S. are financed with BHPH deals. Many of these dealerships are known for high purchase prices, interest rates nearly triple the national average, and aggressive repossession practices. These unregulated loans are known for taking advantage of people with poor credit histories who need a car but can’t get a loan.

Senate Bill 956 contains several important protections that will prevent these dealerships from taking advantage of California consumers. The bill hopes to:

  • Impose regulations that requires “Buy Here Pay Here” auto dealerships to obtain a California Finance Lender license.
  • Limit loans to a maximum 17 ¼ % interest rate.
  • Give consumers an eleven day “grace period” after due payments before the vehicles can be repossessed.
  • Require BHPH dealers to provide written notices to their customers informing them of their legal rights.

The Bill is expected to be reviewed within the next month.