In February 2009 over one hundred complaints had been made to The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) Office in regards to 2010 Prius brakes that do not always function correctly. An internal NHTSA agency memo indicated that the issue was a “short delay” in regenerative braking when hitting a bump. Japan’s Ministry of Transportation ordered Toyota to investigate Prius braking problems after it received 14 complaints, and Toyota received 77 complaints in Japan. On February 9, 2010 Toyota announced a voluntary global recall of third generation 2010 Prius models. A total of 133,000 Prius vehicles in the U.S. and 52,000 in Europe received software updates to fix the problem.

NHTSA has received at least 10 reports of unintended acceleration on Prius models that Toyota claims to have already been fixed under its recall. The Associated Press reported on March 5, 2010 that additional complaints may be a psychological response of “mass hysteria” to “relentless media coverage” of the Toyota recalls.

Below are two accounts of runaway Prius’s that Toyota concluded the problem was driver related as they could not find anything wrong with the car.

On March 8,2010 the California Highway Patrol (CHP) received a 911 call from a man speeding down a California highway at 90 mph in his 2008 Toyota Prius. James Sikes, the driver of the vehicle claimed that his gas pedal was stuck and pressing the brakes would not slow down the car. The highway patrol officer at the scene says he could see the brake lights turn on and off periodically, and he could smell the heated brakes from a quarter mile away.

When the officer told Sikes to shift to neutral Sikes refused, later telling reporters he feared shifting to neutral would cause him to loose control of the car. Eventually, the car stopped on its own by applying the foot brake and parking brake at the same time.

Toyota’s investigators examined the car and found that the accelerator pedal was functioning normally with no mechanical binding or friction. However, the front brakes showed severe wear and damage from overheating. One of the most surprising Toyota findings was evidence of numerous, rapidly repeated on-and-off applications of both the accelerator and brake pedals. Sikes insisted he was pressing hard on the brakes to stop the car, so repeated application of the gas pedal does not seem to make sense, says Toyota. Toyota’s engineers also purposely overheated the brakes, but could still stop the vehicle.

On March 9, 2010 a similar story in New York involved a housekeeper who said that the 2005 Toyota Prius she was driving sped up on its own down a driveway and crashed into a stone wall. The driver of the car was not seriously hurt, but the car was totaled.

The NHTSA said the computer data from a Toyota Prius showed that at the time of the accident the throttle was open and the driver was not applying the brakes.

According to Toyota’s company earnings results, it is estimated that Toyota’s unintended acceleration will affect almost 8.5 million cars world wide and could end up costing the company almost $2 billion. Analysts say that this is a conservative estimate and that the cost will more likely be almost $6 billion, if you include repairs for recalls, lost sales and the ever growing lawsuits being filed against the company.

Still, amongst all the bad publicity, Toyota has done a good job cutting costs over the past year, and it is still a leader in environmental technologies. Most analysts predict good profit growth next year as demand grows in markets like China.

“Toyota has announced plans to deal with the recalls, and is working to address the problems promptly,” said Noriyuki Matsushima, an auto analyst at Citigroup Global Markets Japan. “We think the recall story is likely to die down by April if its quality dealerships can quickly repair the problems while providing reassurance to customers.”

For now, Toyota’s incentives appear to be working. Dealers are reporting surging sales and expect to post a net profit of $885 million in the fiscal year ending March 31, coming back from a loss last year.

David Strickland the administrator for the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has announced that the agency is considering mandatory installation of “black boxes” on all cars and trucks. These “black boxes” similar to flight recorders in aircraft will record critical automobile information leading up to an accident. The NHTSA had first encouraged black box technology in 2006, but because of Toyota’s unintended acceleration problems, the NHTSA hopes to make this technology mandatory and the information from these “black boxes” readily available.

Some feel the addition of this technology will only drive up the price of automobiles which will be passed down to the consumer. Others feel it will reduce our privacy rights by allowing our vehicles to be so closely monitored resulting in benefits for the insurance companies and auto makers but not necessarily the drivers of the automobiles. Even today, with technology such as “On star”, the consumer does not have the choice whether they want it on their vehicle and though it can be deactivated, consumers still wonder what information is being transmitted, and how can this information be used against us.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has announced 2009 as the highest for auto recalls since 2005. Although the number of campaigns was the lowest in five years, the number of automobiles recalled in each campaign was high. 2008 brought about 10.5 million vehicles recalled in 684 campaigns while there were 16.4 million vehicles recalled in 2009 in 492 campaigns. Only Honda reported a decline in recalled vehicles in 2009.

Below is a list of how the recalls were distributed amongst auto makers in 2009:

  • The leader with nine campaigns adding up to 4.26 million vehicles recalled was the automaker Toyota and their unintended acceleration problems. This is the first time a Japanese automaker has led the industry total.
  • Ford recalled 4.5 million vehicles in eight campaigns. The largest being a defective cruise control switch which was linked to vehicle fires.
  • General Motors had 2.2 million vehicles recalled in 16 campaigns. The possibility of engine fires in passenger sedans accounted for 1.5 million vehicles recalled.
  • Chrysler had 15 campaigns, recalling almost 600,000 vehicles. Chrysler’s popular minivans the Town & Country and the Dodge Grand Caravan accounted for over 350,000 of these recalls for defective crash sensors.
  • Honda had four campaigns recalling 454,000 vehicles. Almost all these vehicles were recalled due to an airbag defect.
  • Nissan Motor Co. had six campaigns, recalling 706,000 vehicles in 2009. Almost 550,000 of these recalls were due to a brake pedal pin becoming partially disengaged causing a loss of normal braking power.
  • Hyundai Motor Co. and its Kia unit recalled 1.3 million vehicles in eight campaigns. Over 530,000 recalls were due to a malfunctioning stop lamp switch that could prevent the brake lights from illuminating or cause them to stay lit after the brakes were released.
  • Volkswagen had eights campaigns and 100,000 vehicles recalled. Almost 17,000 sport-utility vehicles were recalled to fix a software program that could lead to passenger air bag failure.

Toyota’s unintended acceleration problem has been flooding the media lately causing fear in anyone who drives on the roads. You hear stories of how someone’s car started speeding uncontrollably and the deaths and injuries that resulted. Drivers of these vehicles said they pressed the brakes, but the vehicle just didn’t respond.

You may be surprised to learn that this is a problem that has been around for quite a while, and is not limited to only Toyota vehicles. ConsumerAffairs.com has received sudden acceleration complaints over the years from a wide range of makes, including Kia, Jaguar, BMW and Ford. Ford coming in second after Toyota. In fact, during the 80’s, Audi went through the same legal and media problems that Toyota experiences now for unintended acceleration.

In 2005 there was an estimated 20,000 consumers who complained to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) of sudden unintended acceleration. Some complaints as far back as the late 1980’s when vehicle first started to be controlled with electronic controls. The problem is difficult to recreate without tampering with the vehicles electronics, so in most cases there is no indication that the vehicle has malfunctioned.

According to engineers familiar with electronic technology any electronic interference could cause the accelerator to surge out of control. In these type of systems there are fail-safes that will reset the computer and will store an error code which can be read by a technician when brought in for repairs. So far, any vehicle that has experienced unintended acceleration has not brought up an error code indicating anything went wrong.

Today at 1:00 p.m. EST Toyota will be holding a web-cast to show consumers that the problems with their vehicles is not electronics related.

During the Toyota Congressional hearings, David W. Gilbert, a professor at Southern Illinois University Carbondale, had told congress that he was able to recreate Toyota’s unintended acceleration by manipulating its vehicles electronics. Toyota will try to duplicate this scenario and debunk it.

Toyota is calling in the director of Stanford University’s Center for Automotive Research to try to argue the claims. Toyota said Stanford professor Chris Gerdes will show that the malfunctions Gilbert produced “are completely unrealistic under real-world conditions and can easily be reproduced on a wide range of vehicles made by other manufacturers.”

Toyota also has hired a consulting firm to study whether electronic problems could cause unintended acceleration. The firm, Exponent Inc., released a report saying that it has found no link between the two.

The webcast is part of a campaign by Toyota to discredit critics, repair its damaged reputation and begin restoring trust in its vehicles.

According to reports filed with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), complaints of unintended acceleration were filed in the last two weeks from Toyota owners that claim that they are still experiencing unintended acceleration even after their recall has been done. In addition to these reports of sudden acceleration, complaints of unusual vehicle behavior, such as erratic check-engine lights, have also been reported.

Although the allegations are unverified, there are concerns that the millions of recall notices issued by Toyota may not fully address the problem. During Toyota’s congressional hearing, congress members voiced their concerns that the problem was not mechanical and that the onboard computer may be the problem.

“There is already doubt out there that the solutions Toyota has put forward really fixed the problem of unintended acceleration,” said Aaron Bragman, auto industry analyst at IHS Global Insight. He cautioned, however, that the complaints should be thoroughly investigated.

Toyota spokeswoman Celeste Migliore said she was not aware of complaints that sudden acceleration had recurred despite receiving the repair, but said the auto maker will closely monitor the NHTSA database.

“We very much would like to have any of those individuals who claim they’ve had unintended acceleration after the fix go back to the dealership,” Migliore said. “If there was an accident, we want to see the vehicle and the driver and the accident report.”

During Toyota’s Congressional hearing, Congress members have been attacking Toyota not only for putting over eight million dangerous cars on the road, but also for how the recall was handled. The Toyota investigation puts government officials in an awkward position of punishing one automaker while being part owner of another. The federal government is a 60 percent shareholder in General Motors, one of Toyota’s biggest competitors.

Toyota Motor Corporation has received the highest number of consumer complaints of unintended acceleration filed with NHTSA. The complaints cover model years 2005 to 2010. According to Edmunds.com, while Toyota has received the most complaints for unintended accelerations, the total filed complaints are fewer than most auto makers. Toyota ranked 17th of 20 automakers in the number of complaints filed with NHTSA over the past decade. Toyota had 9.1 percent of the complaints from 2001 through 2010; during this period, the company sold 13.5 percent of all new cars in the United States. The vehicle with the most complaints, was the Toyota Camry, but it was also the best selling model in 2009.

“This is a very small problem here,” Dow Jones columnist Al Lewis told Fox News on America’s Newsroom. “We have had 2,000 complaints in a decade against the back drop of millions and millions of cars sold.” Auto industry expert Lauren Fix tells Fox the problem shouldn’t be minimized. “When you have all the complaints and Toyota has three times more deaths with the unintended acceleration than any other manufacturer combined, we have a problem.”