Purchasing a used vehicle is a decision many consumers make for perfectly valid reasons. Used cars, trucks, RVs, motorcycles, and other recreational vehicles often come with a significantly lower price tag than new models, making them an attractive option for budget-conscious buyers. When a used vehicle still has some factory warranty remaining, the deal can appear even more appealing.

However, one critical factor is often overlooked during the buying process: lemon law protection. In many cases, used vehicles are not covered by the lemon law at all, leaving buyers exposed if serious defects arise after purchase.

Why Lemon Law Coverage Matters

California’s lemon law was designed to protect consumers from vehicles that have substantial defects and cannot be properly repaired within a reasonable number of attempts. While this protection is strong for new vehicles, it is far more limited when it comes to used ones.

In some situations, purchasing a used vehicle means the buyer assumes the risk of mechanical problems—even if the vehicle still carries a partial manufacturer warranty. This can come as a surprise to consumers who reasonably expect that any remaining warranty automatically provides full legal protection. Unfortunately, that is rarely the case.

The Important Exception: Certified Pre-Owned Vehicles

One category of used vehicles does stand apart: true Certified Pre-Owned (CPO) vehicles. These vehicles are sold exclusively by new car dealerships that represent the same manufacturer as the vehicle being sold. A manufacturer-backed CPO vehicle has undergone a standardized inspection process and includes a factory-supported warranty.

It is important to note that not every vehicle advertised as “certified” qualifies as a true CPO. Independent dealerships frequently use the term “certified” to describe their own inspection programs, but these designations do not carry legal weight under the lemon law. Only manufacturer-backed CPO vehicles receive this special consideration.

Because of the added protections and warranties, CPO vehicles are typically priced higher than other used vehicles. While the upfront cost may be greater, the added security can prove invaluable if serious defects arise later.

Courtesy and Demonstrator Vehicles: Another Protected Category

Another lesser-known exception involves courtesy vehicles and demonstrator vehicles. These are vehicles that were previously used by dealerships as loaners for customers or driven by dealership staff. Although they may have mileage on them, title was never transferred to a consumer.

From a legal standpoint, these vehicles are often treated as new under the lemon law, meaning buyers may still be entitled to full lemon law protections. This makes courtesy and demonstrator vehicles an attractive option for consumers seeking the benefits of lemon law coverage without purchasing a brand-new vehicle.

Balancing Savings and Risk

Buying used can absolutely make financial sense—but it is not without trade-offs. The lower purchase price often comes with reduced legal protection, and consumers must decide how much risk they are willing to assume.

Choosing a true Certified Pre-Owned vehicle or a dealership courtesy or demonstrator vehicle may cost more upfront, but these options offer a level of protection similar to purchasing new. In many ways, the additional cost functions like insurance: an investment in peace of mind should the vehicle turn out to have serious defects.

Making an Informed Decision

The key to a smart purchase is understanding what protections come with the vehicle before signing the paperwork. Consumers should ask detailed questions, verify whether a vehicle is truly manufacturer-certified, and confirm the warranty terms in writing.

An informed buyer is far less likely to face unpleasant surprises down the road. When it comes to used vehicles, knowing where lemon law protection applies—and where it does not—can make all the difference.

The Ford Transit is one of the most widely used vans in California, serving everyone from small business owners and contractors to delivery fleets and shuttle operators. While it is commonly viewed as a commercial vehicle, many Ford Transit owners are surprised to learn that California Lemon Law protections may still apply, especially when serious safety defects or recalls are involved.

Recent recalls affecting 2023–2024 Ford Transit models and certain 2026 Ford E-Transit vehicles raise important questions about owner rights and warranty protections under California law.

Recent Ford Transit Recalls

2023–2024 Ford Transit – Engine Cross-Member Recall

Ford Recall Number: 26S04
NHTSA Campaign Number: 26V-061

Ford has issued a safety recall affecting certain 2023–2024 Ford Transit vehicles related to the engine cross-member. According to the recall, a defect in the cross-member may compromise vehicle structural integrity. Depending on the severity, this type of defect can impact vehicle safety, drivability, and long-term reliability.

Structural or frame-related defects are particularly serious because they can:

  • Affect vehicle stability
  • Increase the risk of component failure
  • Reduce the vehicle’s overall safety in everyday driving conditions

2026 Ford E-Transit – High-Voltage Battery Hardware Recall

Ford Recall Number: 26S05
NHTSA Campaign Number: 26V-062

Ford has also issued a recall impacting certain 2026 Ford E-Transit vehicles involving the high-voltage battery pack. The issue stems from missing washers on internal battery bolts, which may lead to:

  • High electrical resistance
  • Electrical arcing
  • Potential battery system malfunction

Defects involving high-voltage battery systems are especially concerning in electric vehicles, as they can affect vehicle performance, charging reliability, and overall safety.

Is the Ford Transit Considered a Commercial Vehicle Under California Lemon Law?

While the Ford Transit is often used for business purposes, commercial use alone does not automatically exclude a vehicle from California Lemon Law coverage.

Under the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, commercial vehicles may qualify for Lemon Law protection if specific criteria are met.

Key Factors That Determine Eligibility

A Ford Transit may be covered under California Lemon Law if:

  • The vehicle is new or used but still under the manufacturer’s warranty
  • The defect substantially affects use, value, or safety
  • The manufacturer or dealer is unable to repair the defect after a reasonable number of attempts
  • The vehicle is registered in California

For commercial vehicles, two additional factors are especially important:

1. Vehicle Weight

Many Ford Transit models fall under 10,000 pounds GVWR, which keeps them within the scope of Lemon Law protections for commercial vehicles.

2. Fleet Size

Small business owners are often covered if they own or lease no more than five commercial vehicles registered in California. Larger fleets may be subject to different rules.

Why Recalls Matter in Lemon Law Claims

A recall alone does not automatically qualify a vehicle as a lemon. However, recalls can be strong supporting evidence when:

  • The defect is safety-related
  • Repairs are unsuccessful or temporary
  • The vehicle spends excessive time out of service
  • The issue continues after recall repairs are completed

For owners of 2023–2024 Ford Transit vans or 2026 E-Transit vehicles, repeated issues related to the engine crossmember or high-voltage battery system may strengthen a Lemon Law claim if the problem cannot be permanently resolved.

What Ford Transit Owners Should Do

If your Ford Transit or E-Transit is experiencing ongoing problems related to a recall or warranty defect:

  • Keep copies of all repair orders and service records
  • Document how long the vehicle is out of service
  • Note whether the same issue continues after repairs
  • Confirm whether the vehicle is still under factory warranty

California Lemon Law may entitle eligible owners to a buyback, replacement vehicle, or cash compensation, depending on the circumstances.

Final Thoughts

The Ford Transit is not automatically excluded from California Lemon Law protections simply because it is commonly used as a commercial vehicle. Owners of affected 2023–2024 Ford Transit vans and 2026 E-Transit vehicles should be aware that recurring defects — especially those involving structural components or high-voltage battery systems — may give rise to legal remedies under California law.

If recall-related problems persist despite multiple repair attempts, it may be time to explore your rights under the California Lemon Law.

Owners of certain 2021–2023 Jeep Grand Cherokee L and 2022–2023 Jeep Grand Cherokee vehicles may be facing a serious suspension-related safety defect involving the rear coil springs. According to federal safety investigations and manufacturer findings, rear coil springs on some vehicles may have been incorrectly installed during a prior recall repair, allowing the spring to detach and come out of position.

This defect has prompted a new safety recall and may raise important lemon law concerns for affected owners—especially those who already had recall repairs performed.

What Is the Problem?

The issue traces back to recall 64A, which addressed an earlier safety concern. Some vehicles that underwent the 64A repair—or had an incomplete recall status—may have had the rear coil spring incorrectly installed. As a result, the spring can shift or detach from its proper position.

A displaced rear coil spring can affect:

  • Vehicle stability
  • Ride height and handling
  • Suspension integrity
  • Overall driving safety

Even more concerning, vehicles previously repaired under the earlier recall may still be defective, requiring an additional remedy.

Vehicles Potentially Affected

The suspect vehicles were produced between December 5, 2020, and May 31, 2023, based on production and recall status records.

Affected models include:

  • 2021–2023 Jeep Grand Cherokee L
  • 2022–2023 Jeep Grand Cherokee

Vehicles not included in this recall generally fall into one of the following categories:

  • Did not receive a 64A recall repair
  • Were built outside the suspect production period
  • Were equipped with an air suspension system

How the Issue Came to Light

  • June 1, 2023 – FCA US LLC determined a safety defect existed related to recall 64A
  • September 30, 2025 – NHTSA contacted FCA US after receiving 20 complaints involving rear coil spring separation after recall repairs
  • October 14, 2025 – FCA US reported 70 potentially related internal claims
  • November 20, 2025 – FCA US opened a formal investigation into coil spring detachment after recall repairs
  • November 2025 – January 2026 – Engineering and safety teams reviewed failure modes and customer records

As of January 9, 2026, FCA US reported:

  • 20 customer assistance records
  • 284 warranty claims
  • No reported accidents or injuries

On January 22, 2026, FCA US again determined that a safety defect exists, leading to a new recall.

The New Recall: What Owners Should Know

  • Recall number: FCA US LLC 20D; NHTSA campaign number 26V-051
  • Replaces: NHTSA recall 23V-413
  • Important: Vehicles already repaired under the prior recall must still receive the new remedy

What Dealers Will Do

Dealers will inspect and repair the rear coil spring assembly, as necessary.

Owner Notification Timeline

  • Interim safety letters: Expected February 12, 2026
  • Final remedy letters: Anticipated March 2026

Why This Matters for Lemon Law Claims

This recall may be especially significant for lemon law cases because:

  • The defect involves a critical safety component
  • The issue may persist after a prior recall repair
  • Owners may experience repeated service visits or unresolved defects
  • Vehicles already “fixed” may still be unsafe to drive

Under many state lemon laws, a vehicle that cannot be properly repaired after multiple attempts—or that remains unsafe—may qualify for repurchase, replacement, or compensation.

What Owners Should Do Now

If you own a 2021–2023 Jeep Grand Cherokee L or a 2022–2023 Jeep Grand Cherokee:

  1. Do not ignore suspension noises, uneven ride height, or handling changes
  2. Document all repairs, recall notices, and service visits
  3. Schedule the recall inspection as soon as notified
  4. Consult a lemon law attorney if:
    • The issue persists after repair
    • Your vehicle has been in the shop multiple times
    • You feel the vehicle is unsafe or unreliable

Volkswagen has issued two separate safety defects affecting the 2023–2025 Volkswagen ID.4, its all-electric SUV. While both recalls involve safety-related defects, one affects a smaller subset of vehicles and the other impacts a much larger population of ID.4 owners.

Both recalls center on the vehicle’s high-voltage battery system, a critical and potentially dangerous component if defects arise. Battery-related issues are taken seriously by regulators due to the risk of overheating, fire, and loss of vehicle function.

For California drivers, repeated battery issues or extended repair times may also raise lemon law concerns.

Recall #1: High-Voltage Battery Overheating Risk

NHTSA Campaign Number: 26V028000
Volkswagen Recall Number: 93EW

Volkswagen is recalling a large number of 2023–2025 ID.4 vehicles due to a defect that may cause the high-voltage battery to overheat.

What Is the Problem?

Volkswagen has identified an issue in which certain battery cell modules may overheat, increasing the risk of a thermal event. Battery overheating in electric vehicles can potentially lead to:

  • Fire risk
  • Damage to the battery pack
  • Loss of vehicle functionality
  • Safety hazards during or after charging

Because of the seriousness of the risk, Volkswagen has issued immediate safety instructions for affected owners.

Important Safety Instructions for Owners

Until the recall repair is completed, owners are advised to:

  • Park the vehicle outside immediately after charging
  • Do not charge the vehicle indoors overnight
  • Avoid using Level 3 DC fast chargers
  • Limit the battery’s maximum charge to 80%

These precautions are intended to reduce the risk of overheating while Volkswagen prepares the permanent remedy.

Recall Remedy

Volkswagen dealers will:

  • Inspect the high-voltage battery
  • Replace affected battery cell modules as necessary

Owner notification letters are expected to be mailed on March 20, 2026.

Recall #2: High-Voltage Battery Software Defect

NHTSA Campaign Number: 26V030000
Volkswagen Recall Number: 93EA

A separate recall affects a smaller number of 2023–2025 Volkswagen ID.4 vehicles involving the high-voltage battery system.

What Is the Problem?

In this recall, Volkswagen identified a condition where the battery management software may not properly monitor or control battery behavior, which could contribute to overheating or other unsafe operating conditions.

Recall Remedy

To address the issue, Volkswagen dealers will:

  • Update the high-voltage battery software
  • Replace the high-voltage battery if necessary

As with the larger recall, owner notification letters are expected to be mailed March 20, 2026.

Why These Recalls Matter for California ID.4 Owners

Battery defects are among the most serious problems an electric vehicle can face. In California, EVs are protected under the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, commonly known as the Lemon Law.

You may have a potential lemon law claim if your Volkswagen ID.4:

  • Has repeated battery or charging-related issues
  • Requires multiple repair attempts for the same safety defect
  • Is out of service for an extended period due to recall repairs
  • Suffers diminished value or safety concerns even after repairs

Notably, recalls do not cancel lemon law rights. In fact, a safety recall involving a high-voltage battery can strengthen a claim if the defect substantially affects the vehicle’s use, value, or safety.

Bottom Line

Volkswagen’s two recalls for the 2023–2025 ID.4 highlight serious concerns involving the vehicle’s high-voltage battery system. While Volkswagen is offering repairs, owners should follow all safety guidance and carefully document any ongoing problems or time spent in the repair shop.

If your ID.4 continues to experience battery issues, charging limitations, or extended downtime, it may be worth exploring your rights under California Lemon Law.

Subaru has decided that a safety defect could affect certain 2026 Subaru Forester vehicles. According to Subaru, some vehicles were built with an incorrect or improperly oriented rear gate stay bracket, which could cause the rear hatch support stay to suddenly detach — without any warning to the driver or passengers.

What Is the Defect?

The problem involves the rear gate stay bracket, a component that helps support the rear hatch when it is open.  Affected vehicles may have:

  • An incorrect rear gate stay bracket, or
  • A bracket that was installed in the wrong orientation

Either condition can cause the rear gate stay to detach unexpectedly during use.

Why This Is Dangerous

If the rear gate stay detaches without warning, the rear hatch can suddenly lose support. This creates a serious risk of:

  • Head and upper-body injuries
  • Crush injuries to hands or arms
  • Potential injuries to children, passengers, or anyone loading cargo

How Subaru Discovered the Problem

  • October 28, 2025: During in-process inspection, Subaru found a vehicle built with an incorrect rear gate stay bracket.
  • Additional inspections revealed more vehicles with either:
    • Incorrect brackets, or
    • Brackets installed backwards or in the wrong orientation.
  • October 29 – December 10, 2025: Subaru launched a formal investigation and conducted repeated open/close cycle testing.
  • While initial tests did not show failures, Subaru concluded that longer-term real-world use could lead to stay detachment without warning.
  • December 11, 2025: Out of caution, Subaru decided to issue a safety recall.

Subaru admitted the root cause was a faulty work instruction process that failed to ensure the correct bracket was installed in the proper orientation.

Vehicles Affected

  • Model: 2026 Subaru Forester
  • Recall Number: WRG-25
  • NHTSA Campaign Number: 25V-889
  • Owner Notification Letters: Expected to be mailed February 16, 2026

What Will Dealers Do?

Subaru dealerships will:

  • Inspect the rear hatch support bracket
  • Replace the rear gate stay and support bracket if any defect or mis-installation is found

Repairs are expected to be performed at no cost to owners.

What This Means for Lemon Law Claims

Even though Subaru says no injuries have occurred, this defect involves a safety-critical system and was serious enough to justify a federal recall.

You may have a valid Lemon Law claim if:

  • Your vehicle experiences repeat repair attempts
  • The rear hatch detaches or becomes unsafe
  • Your vehicle is out of service for an extended period
  • The defect substantially impairs the use, value, or safety of your Forester

Lemon laws protect consumers when manufacturers are unable to permanently fix serious safety defects within a reasonable number of attempts.

What Owners Should Do Now

  • Watch for Subaru’s recall letter in mid-February 2026
  • Schedule your inspection as soon as possible
  • Keep all repair orders and service records
  • If problems continue after repair, contact a Lemon Law attorney immediately

Final Thoughts

The 2026 Subaru Forester rear hatch recall highlights how even a small manufacturing error can create a serious safety hazard. A rear gate stay that detaches without warning is not a minor inconvenience — it is a potential injury-causing defect.

If your Forester has this issue and Subaru cannot repair it properly, your vehicle may qualify as a lemon.

Owners of certain 2016–2020 Acura ILX vehicles may be experiencing an unsettling brake issue that develops quietly over time. While it does not always appear suddenly or trigger warning lights, the condition can reduce brake effectiveness during everyday driving—particularly during gentle or slow brake applications.  For drivers, any issue involving braking deserves close attention.

What Is the Brake Problem?

The issue centers on the brake master cylinder, a critical component responsible for converting pedal pressure into braking force. In the affected vehicles, a material used in the brake fluid reservoir hose can release excess plasticizer into the brake fluid.

Over time, this contamination causes a seal inside the master cylinder (known as the secondary cup seal) to swell and deform. Heat from the engine can make the problem worse.

When this happens:

  • Brake fluid can bypass the seal instead of building proper pressure
  • The brake pedal may feel softer or less firm
  • Stopping distances may increase, especially during light or gradual braking

In real-world driving, this means the vehicle may not slow down as expected—raising the risk of a crash or injury.

Why Did This Happen?

The root cause traces back to manufacturing timing. The brake reservoir hose was installed too soon after production, before excess plasticizer had time to dissipate. That plasticizer leached into the brake fluid, which was then absorbed by the master cylinder seal.

As the seal absorbed the contaminant and expanded:

  • Its shape and flexibility changed
  • It could no longer maintain a proper seal under certain braking conditions
  • Brake fluid was allowed to leak back into the reservoir

The result is reduced hydraulic pressure when the driver presses the brake pedal slowly.

A Long Investigation Timeline

Honda and Acura engineers spent nearly a decade analyzing this issue:

  • 2015–2021: Initial complaints of intermittent brake pedal pressure loss
  • 2022–2024: Extensive testing confirmed chemical contamination and seal swelling
  • 2025: A clear link was found between hose storage timing, material curing, and seal deformation

By late 2025, the manufacturer determined that this condition posed a motor vehicle safety defect and initiated corrective action.

As of December 2025, there were 192 warranty claims associated with the issue. Fortunately, no injuries or fatalities have been reported.

What Is Being Done to Fix It?

Owners of affected vehicles will be notified by mail and instructed to visit an authorized Acura dealer. The repair involves:

  • Replacing the brake master cylinder
  • Installing an improved sealing cup made from a different material
  • Restoring proper brake fluid sealing and pedal feel

This updated design is intended to eliminate the contamination-related swelling entirely.

Why This Matters for Lemon Law Claims

Even if a manufacturer offers a fix, brake-related defects can still be relevant under Lemon Law statutes, especially if:

  • The problem existed during the warranty period.
  • You experienced repeated brake complaints or repairs.
  • The issue affected vehicle safety, drivability, or value.

Recall Reference: VW Campaign 93EV / NHTSA Campaign 25V-836

If you are the owner of a 2023 or 2024 Volkswagen ID.4, please take a moment to review this critical safety warning. Volkswagen has issued a recall for specific vehicles in this model range due to a high-voltage battery defect that could lead to a vehicle fire.

Because the risk involves the potential for a thermal event (fire) while the car is parked or driving, Volkswagen has issued specific “Park Outside” instructions while they prepare the remedy.

The Issue With The VW ID.4 Battery

The problem lies within the High Voltage (HV) battery. According to the defect report, a production deviation at a battery supplier resulted in misaligned electrodes within certain battery cell modules.  Specifically, the cathode inside the battery cell may have shifted. When these electrodes are not aligned correctly, it increases the risk of a short circuit inside the cell, which can lead to a fire.

Warning Signs

While a battery fire can happen suddenly, there are performance indicators you should watch for. If your vehicle has this defect, you may experience:

  • A noticeable loss of driving range.
  • A reduction in vehicle performance.

If you notice these issues, contact an authorized Volkswagen dealer immediately for diagnosis.

Critical Safety Instructions for Owners

Until the recall repair is performed, Volkswagen is advising owners of affected vehicles to follow these strict precautions to minimize risk:

  1. Park Outside: Park the vehicle away from structures and other cars immediately after charging.
  2. No Overnight Indoor Charging: Do not leave the vehicle charging indoors overnight.
  3. Limit Charge to 80%: Adjust your charging settings to stop at an 80% state of charge.
  4. Avoid Fast Charging: Do not use Level 3 DC Fast Chargers.

Timeline: How the Defect Was Discovered

The investigation into this issue spanned nearly two years. Here is a summary of the events that led to this recall:

  • January 2024 (Illinois): Volkswagen was notified of the first thermal event involving a vehicle connected to a Level 3 DC charger. The battery was analyzed, confirming the fire started in the HV battery.
  • July & October 2024 (California): Two separate fires occurred in parked vehicles that were not charging. Inspections confirmed the origin was the HV battery, but initial analysis (including CT scans by the supplier in June 2025) failed to identify the root cause.
  • December 2024 (Utah): A fourth thermal event occurred while a vehicle was being driven.
  • Summer 2025: With CT scans appearing inconclusive, VW and the supplier investigated other potential causes outside the battery but found nothing. The focus returned to the battery.
  • August 2025 (Colorado): A fifth event occurred while a vehicle was using a DC fast charger.
  • September 2025 (The Breakthrough): The supplier performed a physical “tear-down” analysis of damaged cell modules. They discovered the “shifted” electrode condition. By comparing this physical evidence back to the previous CT images, they realized the defect was visible in the scans but had been previously unrecognized.
  • November 2025: The supplier identified the specific batch of bad modules, allowing VW to isolate which vehicles were affected. On November 26, VW officially decided to issue a recall.

The Remedy

Dealers will resolve this issue by replacing the high-voltage battery cell modules as necessary. Owner Notification: Notification letters are expected to be mailed by January 30, 2026.

  • Volkswagen Recall Number: 93EV
  • NHTSA Campaign Number: 25V-836

Hyundai Santa Fe Bank Display Screen

If you own a model year 2024 or 2025 Hyundai Santa Fe or Santa Fe Hybrid, you need to be aware of a significant safety recall affecting your vehicle’s backup camera system.

Hyundai Motor America has determined that a defect exists in certain vehicles where the rear view camera image may fail to display when the vehicle is placed in reverse. This issue has triggered a noncompliance recall because the affected vehicles fail to meet the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) number 111 regarding “Rear Visibility.”

Here is everything owners need to know about why the cameras are failing, the safety risks involved, and how Hyundai plans to fix the problem.

What is Causing the Santa Fe Camera Failure?

It is frustrating when a new car feature stops working. In this case, the problem isn’t necessarily a defective camera lens, but rather how the camera system was installed at the factory.

According to investigations by Hyundai’s Safety Test and Investigation Laboratory (STIL), the root cause stems from improper installation of the rear view camera wiring harness.

During the manufacturing process, variations in how the “end-of-line” wire harnesses were packaged allowed for inconsistencies in cable routing. In some vehicles, the camera wiring harnesses were installed with a “twist.” This twisting creates increased tension on the wires.

Over time, this tension can cause physical damage to the wiring, including solder cracks near terminal connections and damage to the wire’s shield line. Once these wires are compromised, the connection becomes unstable, leading to a flickering image or a completely blank screen on your dashboard display.

Why This Is a Safety Issue

A functional rear view camera is vital for safe reversing. It helps drivers spot pedestrians, obstacles, and other vehicles in their blind spots.

When the camera fails to display an image, the driver loses this critical view. This noncompliance with FMVSS No. 111 increases the risk of a crash or backup collision.

The Investigation Timeline

Hyundai began looking into this issue between March and June 2025 after routine monitoring of warranty claims showed a spike in inoperative cameras. They analyzed 21 different camera assemblies, discovering the solder cracks and wiring damage. Following extensive review with the supplier and Hyundai’s North America Safety Decision Authority in November 2025, the decision was made to issue a recall.

The Fix: What Hyundai Will Do

  1. Replace the rear view camera assembly entirely.
  2. Reposition the wiring harness correctly to ensure there is no tension causing damage to the new unit.

Important Dates and Next Steps for Owners

If you own a 2024-2025 Santa Fe or Santa Fe Hybrid, keep an eye on your mail.

  • Owner Notification: Hyundai expects to mail notification letters to affected owners beginning January 19, 2026.

If your camera is currently not working, you do not need to wait for the letter to contact your dealer.

Essential Recall Reference Numbers

When speaking with your dealer or searching the NHTSA database, use these reference numbers to identify this specific issue:

  • Hyundai Recall Number: 288
  • NHTSA Campaign Number: 25V-808