A recent discovery by FCA Technical Safety and Regulatory Compliance (TSRC) has led to a voluntary safety recall of certain 2024 Jeep Grand Cherokee vehicles. The issue affects a small number of vehicles that may be missing an important part in the front bumper. This missing piece could compromise the proper deployment of the front airbags.

The affected vehicles fail to comply with the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS) for Occupant Crash Protection. FMVSS No. 208 specifies vehicle crash worthiness requirements and equipment requirements for active and passive restraint systems. In the event of a frontal collision, the missing energy absorbing foam could lead to a non-deployment or improper deployment of the front airbags, potentially increasing the risk of injury or harm to occupants.

According to FCA US, an analysis of vehicle production history revealed that some Jeep Grand Cherokee vehicles may have been built without a front fascia energy absorbing foam. This condition can lead to a non-compliance with FMVSS No. 208, as it compromises the intended load distribution or energy management, potentially jeopardizing proper crash sensing and airbag deployment.

The suspect period for affected vehicles began on December 6, 2023, and ended on December 9, 2023, when vehicle production processes were corrected. During this time, some Jeep Grand Cherokee vehicles may have been manufactured without the crucial foam, which is designed to absorb energy and help protect occupants in the event of a crash.

Dealers will inspect the affected vehicles and install the missing foam as necessary to ensure compliance with safety standards. This recall is intended to minimize any potential risks associated with this airbag issue and maintain the high standards of quality and safety that customers expect from Jeep vehicles.

Owners with affected vehicles will receive owner notification letters providing them with details on the recall and next steps to take. It is essential that vehicle owners take immediate action to address this issue and have their vehicles inspected and repaired as necessary to ensure their safety on the road.

Mini CooperA manufacturing issue was identified in a small batch of 2021-2023 Mini Hardtop 2 Door Cooper SE vehicles. These electric cars were found to have a high voltage battery housing that did not meet the company’s assembly specifications. This discovery came to light after a concerning incident in the U.S. in October 2023, where one such vehicle experienced what is known as a thermal event—a significant overheating.

Following this incident, BMW initiated a thorough engineering analysis to pinpoint the cause. It was found that during certain production periods, there was a flaw in how the battery housing was sealed. Specifically, an inadequate amount of sealing compound was applied between the two halves of the battery module’s housing. This oversight made it possible for water to seep into the battery enclosure.

Water entering the high voltage battery compartment can trigger what is called an isolation fault. This type of fault compromises the battery’s integrity, leading to performance issues and safety concerns. Initially, such water ingress prompts the vehicle to display a warning message, alerting the driver of the fault and advising them to have the vehicle checked at a MINI service center.

Should the water exposure continue, the situation can escalate. The accumulation of moisture can cause multiple isolation faults, potentially causing the vehicle to stall. In more severe cases, particularly after long periods of inactivity, these faults could cause the battery to overheat significantly. Such overheating, while rare, could lead to a thermal event, even if the car is not in use.

To address this issue, BMW is recalling affected vehicles to inspect, and if necessary, repair the sealing of the battery housing. This includes a thorough leak test to ensure the integrity of the battery enclosure. Owners of the affected Mini Cooper SE models will be notified by mail with instructions to visit their dealer. Notification letters are scheduled to be sent out on June 21, 2024. The recall has been officially recorded under the NHTSA campaign number 24V-302.

Vehicle owners are encouraged to respond to the recall notice promptly to ensure their safety and the proper functioning of their vehicle.

Subaru EyeSightSubaru’s EyeSight collision detection system is a significant advancement in automotive safety technology, offering drivers an extra layer of protection on the road. The technology works by utilizing a combination of cameras and sensors that detect vehicles ahead and objects surrounding the Subaru vehicle. If the system anticipates a potential collision, it intervenes by automatically reducing engine power, helping to mitigate the force of impact and potentially preventing accidents.

Which Subaru Cars Have EyeSight?

EyeSight technology is available across several models in Subaru’s lineup, including the Impreza, Outback, Legacy, Crosstrek, Ascent, Forester, and WRX. With its widespread adoption, many drivers have come to rely on EyeSight as a crucial safety feature, particularly in congested traffic or challenging driving conditions.

However, despite its touted benefits, Subaru EyeSight has not been without its share of problems and consumer complaints. In recent years, reports of issues with EyeSight technology have surfaced, prompting concerns among Subaru owners and leading to legal actions.

Problems and Consumer Complaints

A nationwide class-action lawsuit filed in New Jersey federal court highlighted serious allegations regarding defects in Subaru vehicles equipped with EyeSight driver assist technology. According to consumers, these defects pose significant safety risks, with complaints ranging from malfunctions in the lane assist function to problems with the automatic braking system. One recurring issue reported by drivers is the system’s tendency to engage without reason, causing the lane assist function to intervene unexpectedly. Such erratic behavior can lead to confusion and potentially hazardous driving situations, undermining the confidence that drivers place in the technology.

Another common complaint revolves around the automatic braking system, which is designed to intervene in emergencies to prevent collisions. However, some Subaru owners have reported instances where the system failed to activate when needed or, conversely, activated unnecessarily, leading to abrupt stops and potentially dangerous situations on the road.

“Eyesight Unavailable”

In addition to concerns about functionality, some drivers have encountered frustration with the system displaying an “Eyesight Unavailable” message. This message can appear for various reasons, including camera obstructions, adverse weather conditions, or technical malfunctions. While the intention behind this message is to ensure the system’s reliability, its occurrence can leave drivers feeling vulnerable and uncertain about their vehicle’s safety features.

Despite the challenges and consumer complaints surrounding Subaru EyeSight, it’s essential to recognize the ongoing efforts by Subaru and other automakers to enhance the safety and reliability of their advanced driver assistance systems. As technology continues to evolve, addressing these concerns and improving the functionality of collision detection systems will be paramount in ensuring the safety and confidence of drivers on the road.

Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. (Volkswagen) will be contacting the owners of certain front-wheel drive Volkswagen and Audi vehicles because the suction jet pump seal inside the fuel tank could fail. This failure could allow fuel to flow into the evaporative emissions (EVAP) system and possibly leak out of the charcoal canister.

The problems started in August 2016 when Volkswagen determined there was a defect affecting vehicles built with a specific suction jet pump. A Recall (16V-647) was issued and the affected vehicles received an improved version (Version 1.1) of suction jet pump.

In April 2018 Volkswagen started to receive their first reports of suction jet pump failures and an investigation was started. During an analysis of these warranty claims and customer complaints (VOQ’s), the evaluation of the field performance of the improved version of the suction jet pump indicated an increased failure rate. The topic was discussed at the Product Safety Committee’s of Volkswagen and Audi and a recall for all front wheel drive vehicles that have been equipped with the improved version was decided (based on 1410 warranty claims on FWD vehicles with repair dates between 05/01/2016 and 12/31/2023)

The vehicles affected include:
2015-2020 Audi A3 Sedan
2015-2019 Audi A3 Cabriolet
2019-2020 Volkswagen Jetta GLI
2018 Volkswagen Golf Sportwagen GP
2018-2019 Volkswagen Golf Sportwagen A7
2015-2017 Volkswagen Golf Sportwagen
2015-2020 Volkswagen Golf GTI
2015-2020 Volkswagen Golf A7

The recall remedy component is a redesigned suction jet pump (Version 2.0) and has incorporated multiple changes/improvements. The remedy part has the part number 5Q0.201.029 A, the recalled part has the part number 5Q0.201.029.

Owners receiving notices will be instructed to return to their dealers to have the suction pump replaced. Volkswagen’s numbers for this recall are VW: 20UF/Audi: 20YF. The NHTSA campaign number is 24V-110. Vehicles that were previously recalled under 16V-647 will need to have the new remedy completed.

In a recent announcement, Ford has highlighted a critical concern affecting a specific subset of its 2023 Ford Explorer vehicles. The issue revolves around the right-front lower fastener connecting the steering knuckle and strut, which may either be loose or missing altogether. This problem can have significant repercussions on the vehicle’s performance and safety.

A loose or missing connection between the knuckle and strut can lead to improper tire alignment, potentially causing steering pulls or requiring increased steering effort. Moreover, the proximity of the brake hose to the tire in this compromised setup poses an additional risk. If the hose comes into contact with the tire, it may sustain damage resulting in a brake fluid leak, ultimately leading to a loss of braking ability. These circumstances significantly elevate the likelihood of a crash, underscoring the severity of the situation.

Upon receiving a report of a missing fastener,Ford’s Critical Concern Review Group (CCRG) initiated an investigation at the beginning of January 2024. The Plant Vehicle Team (PVT) at the Assembly Plant promptly identified the issue during a routine warranty claim review. Further analysis revealed that the primary double spindle fixture tool responsible for securing the right front knuckle-to-strut fasteners was offline for repairs during a specific period. This temporary setback affected a limited number of vehicles, with Ford confirming that out of 121 Explorer rotations, only one vehicle was found to have a missing fastener. Nonetheless, the company is taking proactive steps to address the concern.

While Ford has not identified any vehicle owner questionnaires (VOQs) related to this condition, it’s crucial for affected vehicle owners to remain vigilant. Signs of potential issues include a visually detectable tire leaning inward at the top or changes in steering effort or pull. Additionally, if there are any indications of tire contact with the strut or spring seat, such as abrasion damage or a burning smell, prompt action is necessary.

In response to this concern, Ford has announced a field action to have the affected vehicles inspected. Dealers will thoroughly examine the fasteners and take appropriate measures, such as tightening or installing them as needed, to rectify the issue. Affected vehicle owners can reference Ford’s recall number 24S04 and the corresponding NHTSA campaign number 24V-091 for further information and to schedule inspections.

Importance of Keeping Records for Lemon Vehicles:

Maintaining detailed records of repairs and maintenance for your vehicle is essential, especially if you suspect that your vehicle might be a lemon. Lemon laws vary by jurisdiction, but generally, they provide recourse for consumers who have purchased a defective vehicle that the manufacturer has failed to repair adequately within a reasonable number of attempts.

Keeping comprehensive records serves several purposes. Firstly, it provides documentation of the issues you’ve experienced and the attempts made to address them, which can be crucial evidence if you need to pursue legal action under lemon laws. Additionally, it helps establish a pattern of recurring problems, strengthening your case for a vehicle replacement or refund.

Furthermore, detailed records can expedite the repair process by providing technicians with essential information about past issues and repairs. This can help diagnose and resolve problems more efficiently, minimizing inconvenience for you as the owner.

In summary, maintaining thorough records of repairs and maintenance is not only good practice for vehicle ownership but can also be invaluable if you find yourself grappling with a lemon. By documenting issues and repairs diligently, you empower yourself to assert your rights as a consumer and seek appropriate recourse if necessary.

Hyundai Motor America (Hyundai) is initiating a recall for certain 2024 Kona models due to a potential risk of electrical short circuiting. This issue arises from the possibility of the battery cables rubbing against the engine control module bracket.

These vehicles are equipped with a 12-volt positive battery cable that could suffer damage during frontal collisions, leading to contact with the engine control module (ECM) bracket. This contact increases the likelihood of an electrical short, which could result in a fire in the engine compartment post-collision. Signs of this problem include smoke or a burning smell emanating from the engine area.

The issue first came to Hyundai’s attention in November 2023, following a report by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) about an engine compartment fire in a 2024 Hyundai Kona 1.6T-GDI AWD during a crash test. The IIHS observed smoke and flames emerging from the engine area shortly after the test. Their preliminary assessment indicated a short circuit in the ECM, which led to repeated reignitions. The situation was resolved after disconnecting the auxiliary battery. This incident prompted NASO to launch a new investigation.

A joint examination by NASO, HMC, HATCI, and IIHS revealed damage to the alternator and 12-volt positive power wiring beneath the ECM, with exposed copper cores. The ECM bracket was found pressing against the 12-volt positive battery cable, believed to have shifted during the crash and caused the electrical short leading to the fires.

In response, Hyundai conducted crash tests in December with newly designed sheathing to protect the 12-volt positive wiring from shorting due to ECM bracket contact. These tests were successful, showing no damage or electrical shorting. Consequently, HMA’s NASO decided to recall the affected Kona vehicles.

To date, there have been no reported crashes, injuries, or deaths related to this issue, except for the single fire incident during the IIHS test. Hyundai is unaware of any field incidents. Vehicle owners will be notified to return their vehicles to Hyundai dealers for the installation of protective sheathing over the wiring. The recall is designated as number 252, with NHTSA campaign number 23V-900.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has recently issued a cautionary statement regarding the use of aftermarket steering wheel decals. They are alerting vehicle owners to the potential safety risks associated with these popular accessories. This advisory, while not directly related to Lemon Law issues, underscores the importance of prioritizing safety in vehicle modifications.

The NHTSA’s Concern

The center of NHTSA’s advisory lies in the potential hazards that steering wheel decals pose. Often crafted from materials such as vinyl or plastic, these decorative additions can interfere with the steering system’s safety features, particularly airbags and control buttons. In extreme scenarios, such interference might hinder airbag deployment in accidents, elevating the risk of driver injury.

A Safety Perspective

The NHTSA’s warning provides an essential distinction between manufacturer defects covered under Lemon Laws and aftermarket modifications made by vehicle owners. Lemon Laws are designed to protect consumers from manufacturer-related issues, but do not extend to aftermarket alterations like steering wheel decals. This distinction is critical as it places the responsibility for any resulting safety issues on the owner post-modification.

Safety Risks of Steering Wheel Decals

While steering wheel decals might appear to be a simple cosmetic enhancement, they can inadvertently impact a vehicle’s safety. These decals can obscure important warning labels or indicators, potentially causing confusion. Additionally, they may alter the feel and function of control buttons, leading to distraction or delayed reactions from the driver in crucial moments.

Manufacturer Warnings and Warranty Concerns

Vehicle manufacturers often advise against modifications that could affect safety feature functionality. Installing aftermarket steering wheel decals could lead to warranty voidance, particularly if these modifications contribute to any system malfunctions or failures. Vehicle owners should consider this potential impact on their warranty coverage before proceeding with such modifications.

Making Informed Choices: Safety vs. Aesthetics

NHTSA encourages vehicle owners to consider safety implications ahead of aesthetic preferences when modifying their vehicles. For those still looking to customize their steering wheels, there are safer alternatives. Options like custom stitching or accessories approved by the manufacturer can provide personalization without sacrificing safety.

Prioritizing Safety in Vehicle Customization

To sum up, while aftermarket steering wheel decals are not a Lemon Law matter, their influence on vehicle safety cannot be overlooked. The NHTSA’s warning is a vital reminder for consumers to carefully consider the safety implications of any vehicle customization. Remember, when it comes to modifying your vehicle, ensuring that aesthetics do not compromise safety is crucial. In the realm of vehicle customization, it’s always better to err on the side of caution.

Door handle water intrusion Recent developments in automotive safety have brought to light a significant issue with the 2021-2023 Volkswagen ID.4 models. These vehicles have been identified as having door handles that fall short of the required standards for water ingress protection. This defect poses a serious safety risk, as it can lead to malfunctions in the door lock system, causing doors to open unexpectedly.

The Central Safety Concern

The main safety hazard is the risk of doors opening spontaneously under high lateral forces, particularly at speeds below 9 mph (15 km/h). This can be dangerous for both the vehicle’s occupants and those outside, including pedestrians and nearby objects. The problem stems from water entering the printed circuit board within the door handle, leading to miscommunications with the door control unit.

Signs of the Malfunction

Drivers and passengers in the affected Volkswagen ID.4 models may notice an unusual clicking sound, similar to that of doors locking or unlocking, which can indicate the onset of this issue.

Timeline of the Volkswagen ID.4 Door Handle Issue

  • June 2021: The first signs of this issue in the Volkswagen ID.4 were reported in the U.S., with two cases of door openings. Investigations pointed to wiring harness damage as a cause of water ingress.
  • April 2022: Additional reports confirmed the presence of water in the circuit board.
  • April-November 2022: Volkswagen conducted in-depth analyses using malfunctioning parts, signal debugging, and accelerated aging tests.
  • November 2022: Tests on field vehicles identified the issue at speeds below 15 km/h.
  • January-February 2023: In collaboration with suppliers, Volkswagen analyzed and tested deconstructed field parts.
  • February 2023: Environmental tests commenced on serial parts to better understand the ingress of water.
  • February 28, 2023: The NHTSA called for a meeting with VWGoA to discuss the ID.4 door handle issue.
  • March 2023: Continued investigations by VWGoA and NHTSA, with no definitive root cause identified initially.
  • March 28, 2023: Completion of climate chamber tests led to the identification of the root cause.
  • April 2023: Volkswagen’s Product Safety Committee started identifying affected ID.4 vehicles.

Recall Decision and Implications

By April 26, 2023, Volkswagen’s Product Safety Committee had decided to recall the affected 2021-2023 ID.4 models, following 28 reported instances of door openings. This recall is a vital step in rectifying a crucial safety defect, highlighting the need for stringent quality control and proactive measures in the automotive industry.